2014
DOI: 10.1142/s0218271814500254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective Baryon Decay and Gravitational Collapse

Abstract: While it is widely believed that the gravitational collapse of a sufficiently large mass will lead to a density singularity and an event horizon, we propose that this never happens when quantum effects are taken into account. In particular, we propose that when the conditions become ripe for a trapped surface to form, a quantum critical surface sweeps over the collapsing body, transforming the nucleons in the collapsing matter into a lepton/photon gas together with a positive vacuum energy. This will happen re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in the following we will assume that in reality a negative cosmological constant universe does not collapse to a singularity due to quantum effects. Our hypothesis is that the same type of conversion of matter massenergy to vacuum energy [11] that we previously proposed [1][2] as the reason for the avoidance of a singular end point for the gravitational collapse of massive stellar cores will also lead to the avoidance of a mass density singularity in a flat negative cosmological constant universe. In particular we will argue that as a result of the ubiquitous formation of trapped surfaces in a flat negative cosmological constant universe most of the matter massenergy will be transforned into positive vacuum energy, resulting in an expanding universe which resembles our universe.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, in the following we will assume that in reality a negative cosmological constant universe does not collapse to a singularity due to quantum effects. Our hypothesis is that the same type of conversion of matter massenergy to vacuum energy [11] that we previously proposed [1][2] as the reason for the avoidance of a singular end point for the gravitational collapse of massive stellar cores will also lead to the avoidance of a mass density singularity in a flat negative cosmological constant universe. In particular we will argue that as a result of the ubiquitous formation of trapped surfaces in a flat negative cosmological constant universe most of the matter massenergy will be transforned into positive vacuum energy, resulting in an expanding universe which resembles our universe.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…These puzzles are all the more perplexing because In quantum mechanics it is not possible for matter to simple appear or disappear. Prevoiusly we have drawn attention [1,2] to the fact that the quantum critical phase transition theory of event horizons [3] provides a plausible explanation for the fate of matter undergoing gravitational collapse; namely, most of the mass-energy of the collapsing matter is converted into vacuum energy, resulting in the formation of a "dark energy star" [4]. Dark energy stars are distinguished from black holes in that their interiors resemble de Sitter's "interior" solution [5] rather than a black hole space-time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our original superfluid model for compact objects [10] relied on Lemaitre's seminal observation [26] that the appearance of a vacuum energy can prevent a (spherically symmetric) object from collapsing to a singularity. Indeed, the appearance of a positive vacuum energy during gravitational collapse [27] is the only mechanism known for preventing continuous collapse to a singularity. To date though there has been no claim from the string theory community that gravitational collapse of matter can lead to the appearance of a positive vacuum energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact result depends on the unknown v r in E r that could be determined by the GRMHD codes discussed in Appendix C. Collimated relativistic solutions for a range of E r profiles are given in Appl & Camenzind (1993). A similar exact cylindrical solution of the Maxwell-Einstein equations appears in Chapline & Barbieri (2014), giving our Equation (1) for zero spin of the black hole. In addition, recent interpretations of jet observations support the idea that the radio-loud AGNs of interest here must produce jets with magnetic fields very close to the black hole (Zamaninasab et al 2014), suggesting that R * in Equation (65a) could extend very near an event horizon due to a black hole.…”
Section: A3 Mass Loading Beyond the Sheathmentioning
confidence: 90%