2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.05233
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective behavior in quantum interference: an alternative superposition principle

Abstract: An interferometer in which all of its components are treated as quantum bodies is examined with the standard interpretation and with a model in which its uncoupled spatially separated components act collectively. These models utilize superposition principles that differ when applied to systems composed of three or more bodies. Interferometric disparities between them involving frequency shifts and recoil are shown to be difficult to measure. More pronounced discrepancies involve correlated interference. The co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, rather than recoiling from an individual scatterer, the particle could in effect scatter from the mass of the entangled scatterer system. [24] L thermal c , proportional to the visibility function, for this artificial scatterer of mass 2M then decreases by a factor of 1∕ √ 2 from that of one scatterer of mass M. This is apparent in Figure 3 by choosing a point on the upper trace and transforming its horizontal component by a factor of 1∕ √ 2, thereby reducing its coherence length, which is proportional to 1∕ √ M, to one proportional to 1∕ √ 2M. The transformed point then falls on the lower trace.…”
Section: Particle-one-scatterer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, rather than recoiling from an individual scatterer, the particle could in effect scatter from the mass of the entangled scatterer system. [24] L thermal c , proportional to the visibility function, for this artificial scatterer of mass 2M then decreases by a factor of 1∕ √ 2 from that of one scatterer of mass M. This is apparent in Figure 3 by choosing a point on the upper trace and transforming its horizontal component by a factor of 1∕ √ 2, thereby reducing its coherence length, which is proportional to 1∕ √ M, to one proportional to 1∕ √ 2M. The transformed point then falls on the lower trace.…”
Section: Particle-one-scatterer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%