1967
DOI: 10.2307/1879595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective-Consumption Services of Individual-Consumption Goods: Comment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Millard Long (1967) asserted that option price is nothing more than the expected value of surplus or $65 in our example. Cotton Lindsay (1969) disagreed and Charles J.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Millard Long (1967) asserted that option price is nothing more than the expected value of surplus or $65 in our example. Cotton Lindsay (1969) disagreed and Charles J.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Thirdly, the commodity is characterized by incomplete excludability and storability. Critics claimed that option valuation would double count the consumer surplus (Long, 1967), but Lindsay (1969) refuted this criticism and emphasized that uncertainty is the key to understand OV. In this paper, the OV is defined as the value of the "option of consuming [a] good at some point in the future, even if [the individual] may never actually take up that option" (Laird et al, 2009, p. 174).…”
Section: Theoretical Originsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quest for a theoretical toundation for option value, and a linkage with other economic values, stimulated a sequence of papers in the literature spanning more than two decades (Weisbrod 1964, Long 1967, Lindsay 1969, Byerlee 1971, Cicchetti and Freeman 1971, Schmalensee 1972, Anderson 1981, Bishop 1982, Smith 1983, 1985, Freeman 1984, 1985, Plummet 1986, Hartman and Plummer 1987, Wilman 1987. Following Weisbrod's intuitive description, Cicchetti and Freeman (1971) based the first theoretical exposition of OV on demand uncertainty.…”
Section: Option Valuementioning
confidence: 99%