2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective decision making in Tibetan macaques: how followers affect the rules and speed of group movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time of our study, the troop consisted of 35 individuals (10 adult males, 20 adult females, 3 sub-adult males, and 2 sub-adult females), and juvenile individuals and infant monkeys were not considered [ 19 ] ( Supplementary material Table S1 ). Movement from the platform to the forest occurred several times a day, giving us the opportunity to observe collective decision-making during group movements [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the time of our study, the troop consisted of 35 individuals (10 adult males, 20 adult females, 3 sub-adult males, and 2 sub-adult females), and juvenile individuals and infant monkeys were not considered [ 19 ] ( Supplementary material Table S1 ). Movement from the platform to the forest occurred several times a day, giving us the opportunity to observe collective decision-making during group movements [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focal animal sampling [ 27 ] was used to observe and collect data from 35 adult and sub-adult members in the monkey group, and the sampling time was 10 min each time. Detailed behavioral definitions are shown in Table 1 [ 10 , 19 , 24 , 25 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, leadership is potentially independent from aggressive and affiliative social behaviours. Indeed, followers follow not only dominants ( Watts, 2000 ; Rowe et al, 2018 ), or kin ( Leca et al, 2003 ; Rowe et al, 2018 ) and close affiliates ( Wang et al, 2016 ), but also central group members ( Leca et al, 2003 ). The ecological setting may also determine who is leading the travel order: when food sources are monopolisable dominants lead, while leadership is distributed with non-monopolizable food sources ( King et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Three Classes Of Social Behaviour and Resource Access: Empirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To take advantage of the benefits of group cohesion, social animals have evolved behavioral mechanisms to coordinate activities during feeding, foraging, and traveling ( Petit and Bon 2010 ; Wang et al. 2015 , 2016 ; Rowe et al. 2018 ; Ravignani 2019 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%