2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.91.063803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective effects between multiple nuclear ensembles in an x-ray cavity-QED setup

Abstract: The setting of Mössbauer nuclei embedded in thin-film cavities has facilitated an aspiring platform for x-ray quantum optics as shown in several recent experiments. Here, we generalize the theoretical model of this platform that we developed earlier [Phys. Rev. A 88, 043828 (2013)]. The theory description is extended to cover multiple nuclear ensembles and multiple modes in the cavity. While the extensions separately do not lead to qualitatively new features, their combination gives rise to cooperative effects… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
157
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
12
157
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction between atoms can be measured by the EIT spectra. Compared with the EIT-like schemes with a static coupling in atomic ensembles [15,17,40,42,44], the local dynamical modulation of the transition frequencies of the atoms introduces a tunable detuning for the coupling field. Therefore, our scheme contains all the ingredients of EIT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interaction between atoms can be measured by the EIT spectra. Compared with the EIT-like schemes with a static coupling in atomic ensembles [15,17,40,42,44], the local dynamical modulation of the transition frequencies of the atoms introduces a tunable detuning for the coupling field. Therefore, our scheme contains all the ingredients of EIT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40,44] to calculate the x-ray reflection coefficient R of the planar cavity as sketched in the main text Fig. 3,…”
Section: Appendix D Derivation Of the Cavity Reflection Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This clearly reflects the importance of interference. In the framework of thin-film x-ray cavities, this interference effect reminding of EIT has been investigated experimentally [35,36] and theoretically [37][38][39]. For significant energy difference φ, in the limit x 1, the poles can be approximately written as [33] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the Parratt formalism and the computer package CONUSS can successfully predict the scattering spectra starting from the structure but cannot be easily used for the inverse problem. A phenomenological quantum model for x-ray cavities was developed several years ago [35,36] and used to model experimental data for specific cases. While quite versatile for single-layer cavities [35], the original model had difficulties to accurately describe more complicated structures, and an extension including multiple modes in the cavity was required to correctly reproduce experimental data for cavities with two embedded nuclear layers [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Refs. [35,36] focus on the regime of single excitations, a situation which corresponds to the studied case of synchrotron radiation driving nuclear transitions, the case of stronger excitation up to population inversion is discussed in Ref. [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%