2019
DOI: 10.1177/0972150919857015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective Influence of Work–Family Conflict and Work–Family Enrichment on Turnover Intention: Exploring the Moderating Effects of Individual Differences

Abstract: Multiple roles at both work and family result in both negative (work–family conflict) and positive (work–family enrichment) spillover, which has their reflections on employees’ job and family outcomes. Research on work–family integration has been largely dominated by studies conducted in the USA and other Anglo countries, and barely a few studies have been conducted in non-Western contexts, especially in collectivistic societies of India, where family roles presume more prominence. This study scrutinized the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar mechanisms can be found in research on well-being, where job stressors have a stronger influence on negative well-being than on positive well-being (Sonnentag, 2015). Based on the literature review by Baumeister et al (2001) and on previous studies in which researchers linked various outcomes to positive and negative spillover (e.g., Wayne et al, 2015;Aboobaker and Edward, 2019), it is likely that negative spillover has a more powerful influence on turnover intention than does positive spillover. Thus, we hypothesize the following:…”
Section: The Relative Contributions Of the Two Spillover Typesmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar mechanisms can be found in research on well-being, where job stressors have a stronger influence on negative well-being than on positive well-being (Sonnentag, 2015). Based on the literature review by Baumeister et al (2001) and on previous studies in which researchers linked various outcomes to positive and negative spillover (e.g., Wayne et al, 2015;Aboobaker and Edward, 2019), it is likely that negative spillover has a more powerful influence on turnover intention than does positive spillover. Thus, we hypothesize the following:…”
Section: The Relative Contributions Of the Two Spillover Typesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Furthermore, positive and negative spillover each seem to have different effects on outcomes (Wayne et al, 2015). Whereas negative spillover typically relates to negative outcomes, positive spillover typically relates to positive outcomes (Aboobaker and Edward, 2019). By focusing on the outcomes of negative and positive spillover separately, one neglects that experiences of negative and positive spillover together constitute the experience of workhome spillover (Mauno and Rantanen, 2013;Rantanen et al, 2013;Aboobaker and Edward, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Work and home interactions have attracted considerable attention in the past few decades due to their significant influences on personal and work outcomes (Aboobaker and Edward, 2020; Campana and Hammoud, 2015; Lim and Tai, 2014; Nauman 2020; Yu et al , 2020). Recently, a new form of family interaction “family incivility” was acquainted with in the work-family literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researches prove that there's a considerable correlation between these roles (Altura, Rao, & Virick, 2020). The explanations behind the work-family conflict are stated as; long and unsteady working hours, overtime working, autonomy status, the scale of the organization, low wages, negative attitudes of management, work relations, promotion, expectations of the family, health status, number of kids, age, income and employee performance (Aboobaker & Edward, 2019;Chrisangika-Perera & Kailasapathy, 2020). Employees' work-family conflicts differ due to demographic factors.…”
Section: Work-family Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%