2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-75255-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective Leadership and Divided Power in West European Parties

Abstract: Palgrave Studies in Political Leadership seeks to gather some of the best work on political leadership broadly defined, stretching from classical areas such as executive, legislative and party leadership to understudied manifestations of political leadership beyond the state. Edited by an international board of distinguished leadership scholars from the United States, Europe and Asia, the series publishes cutting-edge research that reaches out to a global readership. The editors are gratefully supported by an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In those regimes, the closest equivalent to a British Leader of the Opposition is the parliamentary party group leader of the largest party in parliament, rather than the party leader. Further, again, in contrast to the classic powerconcentrating arrangements of Westminster systems, there has been a growing trend towards establishing "dual leaderships," involving two co-leaders, both at the level of the party and parliamentary party leadership, and often also with an emphasis on ensuring gender parity at the top (see, e.g., Campus et al, 2022). Some countries, such as Germany, have even known a more advanced form of leadership dispersion with an occasional separation of party leader, parliamentary party group leader, and top contender for the post of head of government-referred to as "chancellor candidate" in the German context (Helms, 2020b)-performing distinctive functions and roles that are all concentrated in the hands of a classic British-style Leader of the Opposition.…”
Section: Conceptual Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In those regimes, the closest equivalent to a British Leader of the Opposition is the parliamentary party group leader of the largest party in parliament, rather than the party leader. Further, again, in contrast to the classic powerconcentrating arrangements of Westminster systems, there has been a growing trend towards establishing "dual leaderships," involving two co-leaders, both at the level of the party and parliamentary party leadership, and often also with an emphasis on ensuring gender parity at the top (see, e.g., Campus et al, 2022). Some countries, such as Germany, have even known a more advanced form of leadership dispersion with an occasional separation of party leader, parliamentary party group leader, and top contender for the post of head of government-referred to as "chancellor candidate" in the German context (Helms, 2020b)-performing distinctive functions and roles that are all concentrated in the hands of a classic British-style Leader of the Opposition.…”
Section: Conceptual Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tahapan karakteristik faksionalisme yang terakhir adalah polarisasi faksional (Campus, Switek, & Valbruzzi, 2021) (Kaltimprokal, 2021).…”
Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified
“…The main problem with this approach is that scholars focus primarily on leaders' decisions, behaviour, and the changes they cause, avoiding questions about how leaders influence directly and indirectly their followers, how followers can control the leadership process, and what the consequences are of the leadership process for them. All in all, despite some refreshing exceptions (Campus et al, 2021;Elgie, 2011;Kane et al, 2009), political leadership studies remain overly leader-centric, and the lack of empirical research on political followers is notable.…”
Section: A Blind Spot In Political Leadership Studies: Followershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposite pole of political science also falls short of satisfying this research interest. Political leadership studies recognised that leadership is more complex than the overromanticised idea of strong leaders (Brown, 2014) accepting the dark side (Helms, 2012) and collective (Campus et al, 2021) and distributed forms of political leadership (Elgie, 2011;Kane et al, 2009). Still, researchers are determined strongly by leader-centrism, and as Burns (1978: 1) stated, '[i]f we know all too much about our leaders, we know far too little about leadership' (italics in the original).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%