2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.102.010602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective Motion due to Individual Escape and Pursuit Response

Abstract: Recent studies suggest that noncooperative behavior such as cannibalism may be a driving mechanism of collective motion. Motivated by these novel results we introduce a simple model of Brownian particles interacting by biologically motivated pursuit and escape interactions. We show the onset of collective motion for both interaction types and analyze their impact on the global dynamics. We demonstrate a strong dependence of experimentally accessible macroscopic observables on the relative strength of escape an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
213
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
213
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response of an individual i to other individuals is described by an effective social forceF s i , which is the sum of three different components: escape behaviour, where individuals move away when they are approached from behind; pursuit behaviour, where an individual moves towards another individual moving forwards in front of it; and a repulsion component, which ensures individuals maintain a preferred minimal distance from neighbours (the details of the social force calculations can be found in the electronic supplementary material). The escape and pursuit interactions are similar to those described in [15] and only take place if individuals have a distance greater than the repulsion range, but still within the sensory range. There are no escape and pursuit interactions with stationary individuals.…”
Section: (C) Model Implementationsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The response of an individual i to other individuals is described by an effective social forceF s i , which is the sum of three different components: escape behaviour, where individuals move away when they are approached from behind; pursuit behaviour, where an individual moves towards another individual moving forwards in front of it; and a repulsion component, which ensures individuals maintain a preferred minimal distance from neighbours (the details of the social force calculations can be found in the electronic supplementary material). The escape and pursuit interactions are similar to those described in [15] and only take place if individuals have a distance greater than the repulsion range, but still within the sensory range. There are no escape and pursuit interactions with stationary individuals.…”
Section: (C) Model Implementationsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In order to explore the influence of nutritional state on the onset of large-scale migration in locust swarms, we extend Romanczuk et al's [15] model of collective motion, where individuals have selective repulsion and attraction interactions from escape and pursuit behaviour, respectively. This was an abstract model of swarming and thus unsuitable for direct comparison with our data, lacking key features such as biologically derived motion characteristics.…”
Section: Model (A) Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There exist also the special cases where there is no interaction with either approaching or moving away We refer to the situation m a , 0 and m m . 0 as 'escape and pursuit', to due similar behaviour as in the original Brownian particle model [12]. For m a .…”
Section: ð2:8þmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…However, we would like to emphasize that in the original escape -pursuit model with Brownian agents, this spatial anisotropy is essential for the emergence of large-scale collective motion. This is related to the absence of an explicit self-propulsion in the dynamics of individuals in Romanczuk et al [12], and the corresponding low persistence length in individual motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%