2023
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2309952120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective motion in hcp-Fe at Earth’s inner core conditions

Youjun Zhang,
Yong Wang,
Yuqian Huang
et al.

Abstract: Earth’s inner core is predominantly composed of solid iron (Fe) and displays intriguing properties such as strong shear softening and an ultrahigh Poisson’s ratio. Insofar, physical mechanisms to explain these features coherently remain highly debated. Here, we have studied longitudinal and shear wave velocities of hcp-Fe (hexagonal close-packed iron) at relevant pressure–temperature conditions of the inner core using in situ shock experiments and machine learning molecular dynamics (MLMD) simulations. Our res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, V ϕ of H‐bearing B2‐Fe displays no premelting phenomena at the temperature of ICB up to 6,500 K, aligning with the observations of V ϕ for hcp Fe under high pressure and temperature conditions, as reported by Zhang et al. (2023). Consequently, given the high V ϕ value of ∼11.8 km/s for B2‐FeSi at ICB conditions, we conclude that neither H‐free nor H‐bearing B2‐FeSi is a major component in the inner core.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, V ϕ of H‐bearing B2‐Fe displays no premelting phenomena at the temperature of ICB up to 6,500 K, aligning with the observations of V ϕ for hcp Fe under high pressure and temperature conditions, as reported by Zhang et al. (2023). Consequently, given the high V ϕ value of ∼11.8 km/s for B2‐FeSi at ICB conditions, we conclude that neither H‐free nor H‐bearing B2‐FeSi is a major component in the inner core.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Initially, fitting all data sets together (Case 1, Figure S5 in Supporting Information S1) yields ( ∂ 2 K S / ∂P∂T ) P = 1.16(49) × 10 −4 K −1 and ( ∂ 2 G / ∂P∂T ) P = 3.81(47) × 10 −4 K −1 . The results are plotted in Figure 8 against density together with some reported results on V P and V S at high temperatures (Antonangeli et al., 2012; Brown & Mcqueen, 1986; Huang et al., 2022; Lin et al., 2005; Z. Mao et al., 2012; Ohtani et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2023). This fitting provides a good estimate of V P for over the density range while the deviation in V S is slightly larger, likely due to the inherent challenges in accurately measuring shear wave velocities, leading to increased uncertainties in the corresponding data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…(2022) and Zhang et al. (2023) have shown minimal effects on V P but significant shear softening due to melting or pre‐melting effects as conditions approach those of the core. With the current data, which provides precise anchor points and constraints on K S 0 , G 0 , and their first pressure/temperature derivatives, we performed the joint fitting with various data sets into Equations 1–11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations