1997
DOI: 10.2307/3433639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective Radiation Biodosimetry for Dose Reconstruction of Acute Accidental Exposures: A Review

Barry Pass

Abstract: Quantification of the biologically relevant dose is required to establish cause and effect between radiation detriment or burden and important biological outcomes. Most epidemiologic studies of unanticipated radiation exposure fail to establish cause and effect because researchers have not been able to construct a valid quantification of dose for the exposed population. However, no one biodosimetric technique (biophysical or biological) meets all the requirements of an ideal dosimeter. This paper reviews how t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method was used for Japanese atomic-bomb survivors and Chernobyl victims. Further development of individual techniques along with an integrated approach using multiple techniques is required to improve detection limits and improve the time needed for dose assessment in large populations that can be used immediately and retrospectively following external radiation exposure [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was used for Japanese atomic-bomb survivors and Chernobyl victims. Further development of individual techniques along with an integrated approach using multiple techniques is required to improve detection limits and improve the time needed for dose assessment in large populations that can be used immediately and retrospectively following external radiation exposure [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of different techniques have been reported for radiation biodosimetry, including detection of induced chromosomal abnormalities (Wilkins et al 2008;Moroni et al 2010) and electron paramagnetic resonance in teeth. However, there is a general consensus that a richer set of biological measures is necessary, as each mode of response has its own particular benefits and limitations (Pass 1997). However, there is a general consensus that a richer set of biological measures is necessary, as each mode of response has its own particular benefits and limitations (Pass 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%