2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2205.05559
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective theory for an interacting solid in a single-mode cavity

Abstract: We investigate the control of interacting matter through strong coupling to a single electromagnetic mode, such as the photon mode in a Fabry-Perot or split-ring cavity. For this purpose, we analyze the exact effective theory for the collective light-matter hybrid modes of a generic system of N transition dipoles within an interacting solid. The approach allows to predict properties of the coupled light-matter system from the nonlinear response functions of the uncoupled matter "outside the cavity". The limit … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from that, a conventional static mean-field approach, which often provides a reasonable starting point to get a qualitative understanding of a phase transition, does not capture the effect of the transverse field on the transition in the present case: The mean-field approximation replaces the induced interaction by a static and uniform self-consistent field; this mean field, however, vanishes, because the interactions between dipoles that are induced by the transverse field are zero in the static limit due to the positive-definite light-matter coupling. This fact also underlies the no-go theorems which exclude the condensation of hybrid light-matter modes due to the coupling to a single-cavity mode [25,31,35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Apart from that, a conventional static mean-field approach, which often provides a reasonable starting point to get a qualitative understanding of a phase transition, does not capture the effect of the transverse field on the transition in the present case: The mean-field approximation replaces the induced interaction by a static and uniform self-consistent field; this mean field, however, vanishes, because the interactions between dipoles that are induced by the transverse field are zero in the static limit due to the positive-definite light-matter coupling. This fact also underlies the no-go theorems which exclude the condensation of hybrid light-matter modes due to the coupling to a single-cavity mode [25,31,35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This value has been extracted from a fit of the mean-field result for the dielectric constant to experimental data for the paradigmatic quantum paraelectric material SrTiO 3 [34], which yields = 3.3 meV, α = 0.328 , and λ = 4024 (see Ref. [31]). For reference, the dielectric function obtained within the mean-field solution, which is given by (T ) = 1 + λ χ at 1−αχ at with the static susceptibility χ at = FIG.…”
Section: B Model Parameters and Light-induced Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, it has been argued that this may be done by instead shaping the environment of electromagnetic fluctuations through the use of optical cavities, resonators, and metamaterials [14,15]. Many systems have recently been proposed to be amenable to control in this way, including superconductors [6,[16][17][18], excitonic insulators [19], antiferromagnets [20,21], spin-liquids [22], quantum Hall fluids [23], and ferroelectrics [24][25][26][27][28], with a great deal more proposed to exhibit strong coupling between material and optical excitations [29]. Recent experiments on * jon.curtis.94@gmail.com the metal-insulator transition in 1T -TaS 2 even seem to have seen promising signatures of cavity control on the transition temperature [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrinsic SrTiO 3 is believed a quantum paraelectric (QPE) [36][37][38][39][40], lying right at the border of the ferroelectric phase, with long-range order suppressed by quantum fluctuations. Strain, chemical, and isotope substitution have all been shown to tip the system over the edge in to the ordered phase [37], and recently resonant optical excitation of the lattice [38,46] have also been shown to seemingly induce a transition into the ordered phase [47,48], making this a prime candidate for demonstrating cavity control over the phase diagram [24,25,27]. Previous theoretical investigations have largely been limited to single-mode, dipole coupling, and translationally invariant approximations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%