2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.90.033302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective translational and rotational Monte Carlo cluster move for general pairwise interaction

Abstract: Original citation:Růžička, Štěpán and Allen, M. P.. (2014) Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way.Publisher's statement: © 2014 APS http://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.033302 A note on versions:The version pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5][6] and the references therein) as well as for the coarse-graining from the atomistic to the mesoscopic scale [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Ranging from properly tailored biases [5,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and the sampling of 'rejectable' states [27,28] to the combination of Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo with Configurational Freezing [29][30][31], up to now a large number of strategies and alternative algorithms aimed to improve the acceptance of random moves constitute the vast realm of MC methods for the simulation of physical systems. Among all these methods, in this paper we focus on multiple-proposal schemes, in which the outcoming configuration is selected among a number ≥1 of trial configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[3][4][5][6] and the references therein) as well as for the coarse-graining from the atomistic to the mesoscopic scale [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Ranging from properly tailored biases [5,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and the sampling of 'rejectable' states [27,28] to the combination of Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo with Configurational Freezing [29][30][31], up to now a large number of strategies and alternative algorithms aimed to improve the acceptance of random moves constitute the vast realm of MC methods for the simulation of physical systems. Among all these methods, in this paper we focus on multiple-proposal schemes, in which the outcoming configuration is selected among a number ≥1 of trial configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Systems of these particles are quenched from the fluid phase to the region of the phase diagram where condensation into liquid drops ensues. Monte Carlo techniques [18,26,27] are then used to study the competition between the kinetics of crystallization in the drops, and the aggregation of the drops into a single domain, or multiple metastable domains.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If non-local moves were used [19], the system studied here would eventually reach the thermodynamically stable state where gas coexists with a crystal. Translational and rotational MC cluster moves [20,18,26,27], known as virtual move Monte Carlo (VMMC), have been used here to model the dynamics. The algorithm selects the moving particles or clusters according to the local forcefields, and turned out to be particularly efficient in the simulation of aggregation in low-density systems [18,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, such approaches have been useful in modelling relatively dense colloidal suspensions. 60,61 Monte Carlo is particularly appealing for models with a mixture of hard and continuous interactions, 62 such as the model detailed in Section II, since Monte Carlo does not require explicit forces and torques and hence derivatives of the potential. However, we envisage our self-assembling system being spatially highly inhomogeneous because the overall suspension of building blocks is dilute, while the assembling clusters themselves are locally dense.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%