Collective Transnational Power and its Limits: London-Based Nigerian Organisations, Development at ‘Home’ and the Importance of Local Agency and the ‘Internal Diaspora’

Abstract

In the recent wave of enthusiasm about the development role of migration, international diaspora organisations have been posited as powerful actors in the progress of their communities of origin. Drawing on research on Nigerian diaspora organisations in London and their places of intervention in Nigeria, this article seeks to subject such claims to greater empirical scrutiny. To understand the relative importance of these organisations in the development of their 'home' communities, their collective transnational interventions are set in the context of contributions made by local actors and internal migrants within Nigeria. It is found that the international diaspora organisations engaged in this study make a limited, almost marginal contribution to local development at 'home', and that local actors and internal migrants are much more important drivers of community progress. It is therefore argued that 'home'-based actors and internal migrants should be given greater recognition in the conceptualisation of how and to what extent migration contributes to local development. To this end, a translocal perspective is advanced that incorporates local, internal and international actors in more effectively comprehending the development role of migration in all its forms.

A Transformative Presence? Chinese Migrants as Agents of Change in Ghana and Nigeria

“…This wave of interest has been much more positive in its conclusions than established debates about migration and development, attributing migrants with the potential to make significant contributions to their 'host' and 'home' countries through the international flows of money, ideas and influence they engender (DFID 2007;Brinkerhoff 2008;Newland 2010). However, this discourse of migration and development has been criticised for giving too much emphasis to particular, primarily economic factors such as migrant remittances (Page and Mercer 2012) and attributing excessive influence to international migration relative to other social and economic dynamics (Skeldon 2008;Lampert 2014). It is in this context that Castles and others have advanced a social transformation perspective on migration and its effects.…”

Diaspora mobilization and the politics of loyalty in the time of Ebola: evidence from the Sierra Leonean diaspora in the UK

“…International diasporas often claim the policy spotlight because of their visibility to donors and academics in the developed North. However, Mercer et al 2008 (see also Lampert 2012Lampert , 2014 have pointed out that in the African context, overseas diasporas' distance from government institutions back home, the demands of time and expertise on busy working migrant families, their elite makeup, and disagreements with their local counterparts may overstate their impact on local development.…”

Collective Remittances and Development in Rural Mexico: a View from Chicago's Mexican Hometown Associations

“…Beyond the Mexican case, other cases have confirmed the limited potential for collective migrant actors. For example, in his recent study of London‐based Nigerian HTAs, Ben Lampert () finds that diaspora organisations engaged in transnational activities make an almost marginal contribution to local development at home and that local actors and internal migrants are more important drivers of community progress. The evidence presented in this study confirms the previous studies on the negligible contributions of HTAs to local community development; however, this study unpacks the multiple scales leading to increased interest in leveraging remittances for development and the ways in which these processes may lead to increased inequalities in local sending communities.…”