Collective vs. individual lobbying

Matsueda, Norimichi

doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101859

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, despite the many shared barriers to change reported across the diverse stakeholders interviewed, there remains a lack of collaboration across numerous trade bodies representing industry sub-sectors. Trade bodies could become multi-stakeholder ‘bridging leaders’ 30 , 31 of change by aligning in their individual 32 efforts towards the shared vision (Table 1 and Fig. 4 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Circular wood use can accelerate global decarbonisation but requires cross-sectoral coordination

Forster,

Healey,

Newman

et al. 2023

Nat Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Predominantly linear use of wood curtails the potential climate-change mitigation contribution of forestry value-chains. Using lifecycle assessment, we show that more cascading and especially circular uses of wood can provide immediate and sustained mitigation by reducing demand for virgin wood, which increases forest carbon sequestration and storage, and benefits from substitution for fossil-fuel derived products, reducing net greenhouse gas emissions. By United Kingdom example, the circular approach of recycling medium-density fibreboard delivers 75% more cumulative climate-change mitigation by 2050, compared with business-as-usual. Early mitigation achieved by circular and cascading wood use complements lagged mitigation achieved by afforestation; and in combination these measures could cumulatively mitigate 258.8 million tonnes CO2e by 2050. Despite the clear benefits of implementing circular economy principles, we identify many functional barriers impeding the structural reorganisation needed for such complex system change, and propose enablers to transform the forestry value-chain into an effective societal change system and lead to coherent action.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Circular wood use can accelerate global decarbonisation but requires cross-sectoral coordination

Forster,

Healey,

Newman

et al. 2023

Nat Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the literature on the analysis of the game between local governments and polluting firms, some studies have analyzed their regulation and rent-seeking, respectively, from the perspective of the Nash equilibrium under mixed strategies [ 4 ]. Others have analyzed the equilibrium outcomes of the firm–government game under different institutional arrangements [ 5 ], and some studies have analyzed how environmental regulation affects the direction of industry output equilibrium in the context of Cournot competition and oligopoly [ 6 ]. In the literature on environmental strategy games among local governments, some studies have analyzed rational government and inefficient environmental regulation from the perspective of the Pigou tax [ 7 ], whereas others have used evolutionary games to analyze the evolutionary paths and stabilization strategies of local governments in air pollution control [ 8 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Game Analysis of the Evolution of Local Government’s River Chief System Implementation Strategy

Wang

Wan

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As the executor of the River Chief System (RCS), local governments’ choice of implementation strategies directly affects the quality of regional water environment. The implementation of the RCS involves many interest subjects, and has gradually formed a game between enterprises’ sewage management and local governments’ RCS implementation strategies, and a game between the RCS implementation strategies of different local governments. The game behavior between the interested parties is long-term and dynamic in nature. Strategies such as reducing the cost of local governments’ implementation of the RCS and increasing the rate of sewage charges will lead to the evolution of the strategy set between enterprises’ treatment of sewage and local governments’ RCS implementation in the direction of {complete treatment of sewage, strictly enforcing the RCS}. Analysis of the evolutionary game model between the local governments reveals that strategies such as reducing the weight of economic indicators in local governments’ assessment, and increasing the material and spiritual rewards for implementing the RCS, will lead to the evolutionary game outcome of implementing the RCS between the local governments in the direction of {strictly enforcing the RCS, strictly enforcing the RCS}. The external effects of sewage discharge do not affect the evolution of the game system between the local governments.

show abstract

Lobbying: A Public Choice Perspective

Polk

2023

Studies in Public Choice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collective vs. individual lobbying

Cited by 9 publications

References 21 publications

Circular wood use can accelerate global decarbonisation but requires cross-sectoral coordination

Circular wood use can accelerate global decarbonisation but requires cross-sectoral coordination

Game Analysis of the Evolution of Local Government’s River Chief System Implementation Strategy

Lobbying: A Public Choice Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About