2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-31299-1_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective Writing: The Continuous Struggle for Meaning-Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuing from the wonders (Gale & Wyatt, 2017;MacLure, 2013), we created a space to write experimentally, creatively, and reflexively to collectively inquire about our identities and positionalities as Korean transnationals. The process of collaborative writing as a mode of inquiry (e.g., Alhayek et al, 2023;Jandrić et al, 2023) was not a pre-designed qualitative research per se. Instead, through monthly thematic writings and meetings for six months, we shared what we were pondering, feeling, and encountering at the temporal and spatial points of our personal and professional lives, and based on this conversation, each of the five authors suggested writing themes and prompts for everyone to write about until the next meeting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuing from the wonders (Gale & Wyatt, 2017;MacLure, 2013), we created a space to write experimentally, creatively, and reflexively to collectively inquire about our identities and positionalities as Korean transnationals. The process of collaborative writing as a mode of inquiry (e.g., Alhayek et al, 2023;Jandrić et al, 2023) was not a pre-designed qualitative research per se. Instead, through monthly thematic writings and meetings for six months, we shared what we were pondering, feeling, and encountering at the temporal and spatial points of our personal and professional lives, and based on this conversation, each of the five authors suggested writing themes and prompts for everyone to write about until the next meeting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This marriage of inquiry, collaboration, and becoming suggests this method for researching the experiences of practitioners who are already active in inquiry, and want to look back and develop their own thinking, together with others (cf. Abegglen, Burns & Sinfield 2022a, 2022bJandrić et al 2023). It expands the field of research -it multiplies, emerges -it has no center, no unified or author-itative voice -it is collective thinking in process (Hamon et al 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%