2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.83.061304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collectivity inS41

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that our level scheme disagrees with the scheme proposed by Wang et al [17] based on a low-statistics γ-ray singles spectrum obtained in multinucleon transfer. Wang et al suggest that the 904 keV γ-ray transition reported in intermediate-energy Coulomb excitation [14], although they did not observe it in their own work, corresponds to the decay of the 9/2 − state to the ground state.…”
Section: Dcontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is noted that our level scheme disagrees with the scheme proposed by Wang et al [17] based on a low-statistics γ-ray singles spectrum obtained in multinucleon transfer. Wang et al suggest that the 904 keV γ-ray transition reported in intermediate-energy Coulomb excitation [14], although they did not observe it in their own work, corresponds to the decay of the 9/2 − state to the ground state.…”
Section: Dcontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Furthermore, SDPF-U level schemes are available in the literature for 39 S [38], 40 S [18], and 41 S [17]. In contrast to SDPF-MU, the SDPF-U effective interaction consists of two parts, one valid for Z ≤ 14 and one applicable to Z ≥ 15 [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, charge screening from both ionized nuclei and electrons in relativistic electronpositron plasmas have been discussed and applied to the determination of thermonuclear reaction rates [13,14]. This effect turned out to be negligible during the BBN epoch because the plasma is in a high temperature, low density state, and the distance between electrons or positrons and nuclei is so large that the screening effect on the Coulomb potential is not significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%