The purpose of this study was to identify specific and modifiable supported education (SEd) service needs for the veteran population. To do so, we compared veterans participating in SEd services to other veterans on campus with respect to service-related challenges, community reintegration, and academic-related challenges. Identifying independent factors that distinguish veterans receiving SEd services from other veterans on campus may help operationalize interventions that target the unique challenges in this vulnerable population. Method: This study used an exploratory cross-sectional design. We used logistic regression on 410 veterans attending college. Models tested whether sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age), service-related challenges (e.g., combat exposure), academic-related challenges (e.g., academic self-efficacy), and aspects of community reintegration (e.g., employment status) distinguished veterans receiving SEd services (n ϭ 94) from veterans on campus (n ϭ 316). Results: Veterans who reported (a) more severe combat exposure, (b) more severe posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, (c) service-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), (d) lower levels of academic self-efficacy, and (e) no paid employment were more likely to participate in SEd services. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: This study established several factors that distinguished veterans receiving SEd services from veterans on campus. Findings indicate that SEd education services for veterans should: (a) apply principles of trauma-informed care, (b) mitigate the influence of PTSD and/or mTBI upon academic success and community reintegration, (c) promote academic self-efficacy, and (d) integrate principles of supported employment.
Impact and ImplicationsThis study found that veterans receiving supported education services reported greater service-related challenges (more severe combat exposure, greater symptoms of PTSD, and a higher likelihood of service-related mild traumatic brain injury) and lower academic self-efficacy, and were less likely to be employed. These findings can help operationalize interventions that target the unique challenges among the veteran population.