2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.82.053004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collider signatures for the heavy lepton triplet in the typeI+IIIseesaw mechanism

Abstract: The minimal SU(5) theory augmented by the fermionic adjoint representation restores the coupling constant unification and gives realistic neutrino masses and mixing through the hybrid Type I and Type III seesaw. The crucial prediction of the theory is an SU(2) lepton triplet with the mass below TeV. We study the signature of these heavy leptons and propose the strategy to test this mechanism at the hadron and lepton colliders. The smoking gun evidence of the theory is ∆L = 2 lepton number violation through eve… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the LHC reach for fermion triplets discovery is around 700-800 GeV [31,32], from the previous discussion, one could be tempted to conclude that any observation of fermionic triplets at the LHC would rule out leptogenesis within this framework. This however is not entirely correct as the asymmetry might be generated by degrees of freedom at higher scales -T 2 in triplet scenario for example 6 .…”
Section: Implications For Tev Leptogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that the LHC reach for fermion triplets discovery is around 700-800 GeV [31,32], from the previous discussion, one could be tempted to conclude that any observation of fermionic triplets at the LHC would rule out leptogenesis within this framework. This however is not entirely correct as the asymmetry might be generated by degrees of freedom at higher scales -T 2 in triplet scenario for example 6 .…”
Section: Implications For Tev Leptogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally some conclusions about whether successful high scale (due to T 2 or any other mechanism, possibly unrelated to neutrino mass generation) leptogenesis is achieved can be drawn by producing T 1 at colliders, verifying its lepton number violating interactions (typically using same sign di-lepton event signatures [31,32]) and measuring its branching ratios and the total decay width. From eq.…”
Section: Implications For Type III See-saw Models At the Lhcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To discern the underlying physics that is responsible for neutrino masses, it is vital to produce directly the relevant heavy particles at colliders and study their properties [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In this paper, we will study the LHC phenomenology of the type II seesaw mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What in practice means observing events with an excess of leptons, or anti-leptons. Among the three see-saw mechanisms, the see-saw of type II gives the cleanest signal because doubly-charged scalars can decay into pairs of same-sign charged leptons, ∆ ±± → l ± l ± , which accumulate around the doubly-charged scalar mass and allow for a very efficient search [52,53]; which is not the case for heavy fermions because they decay into an odd number of light fermions (≥ 3, if we exclude decays into Higgs bosons decaying in turn into two photons) [54][55][56][57][58][59], as required by rotational invariance. As a matter of fact, CMS [60] and ATLAS [61] have already set stringent limits on this process, excluding doubly-charged scalar masses m ∆ ±± ranging from 200 to 400 GeV, depending on the assumptions on the branching ratios into same-sign dileptons; although they have not reported on the corresponding limits for LNV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%