2009
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/15580890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collimator with filtration compensator: clinical adaptation to meet European Union recommendation 4F on radiological protection for dental radiography

Abstract: A radiographic examination can be carried out with children using only a third of the dose normally used with no increase in the time or cost involved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, cephalometric analysis can potentially suggest the structural evolution of the patient through the growth pattern analysis (26), but cannot provide prediction of growth rate or reveal a patient's current stage. For these reasons, the European directives on radiation protection consider this procedure as non-critical for the purposes of orthodontic diagnosis (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, cephalometric analysis can potentially suggest the structural evolution of the patient through the growth pattern analysis (26), but cannot provide prediction of growth rate or reveal a patient's current stage. For these reasons, the European directives on radiation protection consider this procedure as non-critical for the purposes of orthodontic diagnosis (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It achieved more than 40% dose reduction when tested on a phantom head with inserted dosemeters (Figure 1). In 2009, Alcaraz et al 10 designed and tested a prototype of a wedge-shaped collimator that could be mounted on a specific combination panoramic–cephalometric imaging system. They found up to 60% dose reductions but concluded that the area below the mandible was not effectively shielded without individual modification of the collimator for each patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without adjustment, there will either be too much shielding in patients with mandibles that grow or are located lower than average or not enough shielding for patients who have smaller or more superiorly located mandibles. 10 Finally, a wedge-shaped collimator may block imaging of the cervical vertebrae. Depiction of the cervical vertebrae has become desirable since the developmental stages of these vertebrae have been used as indices of skeletal maturation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The literature contains descriptions of a number of collimators that have been developed to comply with these guidelines. [3][4][5][6][7] Unfortunately, these collimators have not achieved wide acceptance in the orthodontic field. 8 This could be because the proposed collimators were designed for dedicated cephalometric X-ray installations but not for the currently used combined panoramic-cephalometric machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%