2020
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2020.1742083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision avoidance behaviours when circumventing people of different sizes in various positions and locations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the average speed to the obstacle decreased when the avoidance margin was small (Conditions 6, 7, and 8). The results of the study are in line with those of a recent study 5 , which found that individuals slow down their walking speed when they are 2 m from the obstacle. Therefore, our findings indicate that individuals plan ahead to maintain an avoidance margin between themselves and obstacles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the average speed to the obstacle decreased when the avoidance margin was small (Conditions 6, 7, and 8). The results of the study are in line with those of a recent study 5 , which found that individuals slow down their walking speed when they are 2 m from the obstacle. Therefore, our findings indicate that individuals plan ahead to maintain an avoidance margin between themselves and obstacles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Other studies have demonstrated the importance of an avoidance margin which has been defined as the distance between the participant’s body and the edge of the obstacle during obstacle avoidance. These studies have demonstrated that participants will maintain an avoidance margin between themselves and the obstacle, and that this distance depends on the characteristics of the obstacle 5 16 . Previous path planning models have described the effects of deviation angle and/or minimum distance from an obstacle on path planning 1 , 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current experiment, when the approaching VRP wore a facial mask, this onset distance was increased by approximately 0.18m. This change in onset distance is, in our perspective, meaningful, as unlike other obstacle clearance metrics such as minimum distance and maximum deviation, onset distance is a fairly stable measure that was shown to remain constant despite manipulations of characteristics of the interferer, such as gender, size, body orientation, and pattern of limb movements 7,26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These factors have been shown to result in slower walking speeds, larger safety margins, and increased risk of collision during obstacle circumvention 5,6 . Additional avoidance behaviour modulations have been observed during interactions with pedestrians of different sizes 7 and pedestrians as opposed to a robot 8 . Finally, studies have shown that avoidance strategies differ depending on situational factors such as the direction of obstacle approach [9][10][11] and whether one assumes a passive or active role during the interaction 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Using pairwise situations, authors previously showed that pedestrians adapt their motion only if there is a future risk of collision [35]. Authors considered the effect of situational factors such as crossing angle [24], [25], crossing order [34] or orientation [8] as well as personal factors such as gender and personality [25] or body size [8] on motion adaptations. While these previous studies have considered the kinematics of the adaptions, other works were interested in the gaze activity, showing that it can predict future crossing order [17] and that gaze behaviour is task-dependent [22].…”
Section: Pedestrian Interaction Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%