2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.99.044918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision-energy dependence of pt correlations in Au + Au collisions at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and (b) represent the values estimated from the experimental measurements reported in Refs. [54] and [56]. They show good qualitative agreement with the corresponding simulated results as well.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…and (b) represent the values estimated from the experimental measurements reported in Refs. [54] and [56]. They show good qualitative agreement with the corresponding simulated results as well.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The reason is that the AMPT model fails to describe the radial flow and its fluctuations [34]. In fact we found AMPT underestimates the var([p T ]) data [35] for Au+Au at RHIC by more than factor of two, and this problem is there for all recent versions of AMPT. This failure implies that radial flow response to the size of the system is too weak in AMPT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…the centrality dependence of average transverse momentum ⟪p T ⟫ ≡ ⟨[p T ]⟩ and the variance ⟨(δ[p T ]) 2 ⟩ do not describe the experimental data [14,51]. A recent modification of the model [52] fixed the problem with the ⟪p T ⟫, but the value of ⟨(δ[p T ]) 2 ⟩ is still more than a factor of 3 lower than the STAR data [21,53] 2 . This implies that the response of [p T ] to d ⊥ in AMPT is a lot weaker than experimental finding, this probably is also the reason why the model underestimates quantitatively the sign-change of ⟨v 2 2 δ[p T ]⟩ in U+U collisions associated with the large prolate deformation Uranium nucleus observed by the STAR data [21].…”
Section: Setup Of the Glauber Model And The Ampt Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%