1980
DOI: 10.3367/ufnr.0131.198007b.0343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collisional diffusion of a partially-ionized plasma in a magnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the magnetic field is large enough for flow anisotropies to be significant, at least for electrons, and if the only gradients are perpendicular to the magnetic field, one may expect to have an identical situation in the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field direction as that obtained in all directions in the absence of magnetic field (Monroe 1973;Zhilinskii and Tsendin 1980;Golant et al 1980;Vidal et al 1999), in which the free diffusion coefficients and mobilities should be replaced with coefficients and mobilities under the action of a magnetic field. When a magnetic field exists the equivalent equation to (6.11) is now D a?…”
Section: Ambipolar Diffusion With a Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the magnetic field is large enough for flow anisotropies to be significant, at least for electrons, and if the only gradients are perpendicular to the magnetic field, one may expect to have an identical situation in the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field direction as that obtained in all directions in the absence of magnetic field (Monroe 1973;Zhilinskii and Tsendin 1980;Golant et al 1980;Vidal et al 1999), in which the free diffusion coefficients and mobilities should be replaced with coefficients and mobilities under the action of a magnetic field. When a magnetic field exists the equivalent equation to (6.11) is now D a?…”
Section: Ambipolar Diffusion With a Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering conditions for the formation of a perturbed ionospheric region in the part of evolution of different-scale plasma-density and plasma-temperature fluctuations, it is assumed, as a rule, that they propagate along the geomagnetic field due to thermodiffusion mechanisms of spreading from the region of intense generation of perturbations near the PW reflection point having small vertical sizes compared with the heat-conductance length (see, e.g., [26][27][28][29][30]). In this case, the velocity of propagation of perturbations along the geomagnetic field in the ambipolar approximation, which is often used, must be determined by the collisional diffusion of ions as the most mobile particles in this direction and have a characteristic value close to their thermal velocity, i.e., V ≈ V T i ≈ 10 5 cm/s for typical conditions of the experiments we performed in the F 2 layer of the midlatitude ionosphere.…”
Section: Discussion Of Measurement Results and Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currents are therefore proportional to the ion implantation flux into the surface, i.e., to the density times the ion thermal speed, as verified by our IHM runs. A related example of “thermal” field‐aligned plasma currents may be the “short‐circuit” effect first discussed by Simon [] in magnetically confined laboratory plasmas, in which cross‐field thermal ion diffusion, e.g., to the axial walls of a conductive containment vessel [ Zhilinskii and Tsendin , ], can induce field‐aligned electron eddy currents which short across field lines at the end walls [ Drentje et al ., ]. The competition of these currents with electron ambipolar diffusion has been the focus of recent theoretical discussion [ Fruchtman , ] and simulation studies [ Lafleur and Boswell , ], and thermally driven electron shorting currents turn out to be a significant design consideration for electron cyclotron ion sources [ Schachter et al ., ].…”
Section: Current System Wave Modes and Physical Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%