2005
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/45/2/l01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collisionality and shear dependences of density peaking in JET and extrapolation to ITER

Abstract: Results from an extensive database analysis of JET density profiles in stationary conditions show that the density peaking factor ne0/⟨ne⟩ in JET H modes increases from near 1.2 at high collisionality to around 1.5 as the plasma collisionality decreases towards the values expected for ITER. This result confirms an earlier observation on AUG. The density peaking behaviour of L modes is remarkably different from that of H modes, scaling with overall plasma shear as (ne0/⟨ne⟩ ∼ 1.5li), independently of collisiona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
139
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
22
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That gives us ν eff (ITER) = 0.19 and n 0.2 / n e (ITER) = 1.42-1.55, R/L n (ITER) = 2.0-2.8, depending which of the derived scaling expressions is used. The prediction for the peaking factor is in agreement with the extrapolations done in previous publications [2][3][4] despite being based on different datasets and using slightly different regression variables than here. The expectations for R/L n values are lower in this work (2.4 ± 0.4 instead of 4.0 ± 1.0), but as stated before, the value used in this work is calculated over the large density profile range and can be slightly biased with respect to definitions used in other publications.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…That gives us ν eff (ITER) = 0.19 and n 0.2 / n e (ITER) = 1.42-1.55, R/L n (ITER) = 2.0-2.8, depending which of the derived scaling expressions is used. The prediction for the peaking factor is in agreement with the extrapolations done in previous publications [2][3][4] despite being based on different datasets and using slightly different regression variables than here. The expectations for R/L n values are lower in this work (2.4 ± 0.4 instead of 4.0 ± 1.0), but as stated before, the value used in this work is calculated over the large density profile range and can be slightly biased with respect to definitions used in other publications.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…That can explain a dramatic difference between the density peaking observed in JET and AUG H-mode plasmas and ECRH heated H-mode case on TCV [15] (with T i /T e 1 and vanishing core particle source), where density peaking is considerably higher for the same collisionalities, compared with the scalings derived in [2][3][4].…”
Section: Gs2 Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Density peaking in tokamak plasmas has been shown to decrease with increasing collisionality in ASDEX Upgrade [1] and JET (Joint European Torus) [2] H-modes [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R / L N is defined positive for the usual peaked density profiles ͑R / L N ϵ −R ٌ n / n͒, and the density gradient in the TEP theory, therefore, leads to an outward flow of parallel momentum when the density profile is peaked. TEP alone can hardly be expected to lead to peaked rotation profiles for L-mode or low collisionality H-mode plasmas because the density gradient is observed 6,7 and predicted 8 to be R / L N Ϸ 3 -4 under these conditions, such that RV / Ϸ 0. Angular momentum profiles are peaked, but the peaking is mainly due to the peaked density whereas the rotation profile would be flat.…”
Section: ͑12͒mentioning
confidence: 99%