1970
DOI: 10.2514/3.6089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collisionless electrostatic single-probe and double-probe measurements

Abstract: An algebraic fit is made to the results of a numerical analysis describing the collisionless current attracted to cylindrical Langmuir probes whose ratios of probe radius to Debye length are of moderate value. The probe currents indicated by these expressions are compared to some numerically computed values and to values obtained using an approximate analytical solution. This algebraic description of the single-probe response is then used to derive the double-probe characteristics in the region where the curre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the probe measurements have not been analyzed by applying linear extrapolation of the saturation currents to plasma potential, but by the procedure proposed by Peterson and Talbot. 32,33 This yields somewhat lower electron densities than reported in previous studies for similar plasma conditions. 8 The procedure gives the electron and ion saturation current at plasma potential, the electron temperature, the plasma potential, and the ratio of probe radius and Debye length.…”
Section: B Langmuir Probe Measurementscontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore the probe measurements have not been analyzed by applying linear extrapolation of the saturation currents to plasma potential, but by the procedure proposed by Peterson and Talbot. 32,33 This yields somewhat lower electron densities than reported in previous studies for similar plasma conditions. 8 The procedure gives the electron and ion saturation current at plasma potential, the electron temperature, the plasma potential, and the ratio of probe radius and Debye length.…”
Section: B Langmuir Probe Measurementscontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…The currents drawn with the double probe and in the time-dependent measurements showed good agreement. The double probe measurements were again analyzed by an appropriate procedure proposed by Peterson and Talbot, 32 yielding the electron temperature, the ion saturation current at plasma potential, the voltage difference between floating and plasma potential, and the ratio of probe radius and Debye length. Comparison of single and double probe measurements in Ar and Ar-H 2 plasmas revealed an agreement in electron density within 15%.…”
Section: B Langmuir Probe Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The signal was filtered by a LC electrical network to remove unwanted RF components. For the ion energy and ion flux measurements, an Impedans Semion retarding field energy analyzer (RFEA) was employed, placed on the substrate stage.…”
Section: B Substrate-tuned Biasing and Rf Biasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, unless the probe area is sufficient small, it may draw large electronic current by disturbing the discharge conditions when operated close to the space potential which shows that the single probe method is not suitable for decaying plasmas accompanied by the perturbation of the discharge plasmas. In order to overcome these difficulties introduced by the SLP method, the double and triple Langmuir probe methods are settled, which have negligible influence on the discharges and yield an accurate data for the measurement of plasma parameters in all types of discharge plasmas (Peterson and Talbot, 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%