2022
DOI: 10.1029/2021jd035874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collocated Measurements of Light‐Absorbing Organic Carbon in PM2.5: Observation Uncertainty and Organic Tracer‐Based Source Apportionment

Abstract: Organic matter (OM) constitutes a significant fraction (20%-90%) of fine particles with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 (PM 2.5 ) or 1.0 μm (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The misclassification of BrC sources based on low time‐resolved measurements is likely caused by the missing of diurnal source cycles. The coal combustion, microbial activity, and lubricating oil combustion factors were identified and well explained at the same study location and were not major sources of BrC (Gou et al., 2021; M. Xie et al., 2022b; Z. Xu et al., 2022). The stacked factor contributions of the PMF total and PMF summer solutions reasonably reflected the diurnal patterns of input species (Figure 5 and Figure S9 in Supporting Information ), but the peak values were usually underestimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The misclassification of BrC sources based on low time‐resolved measurements is likely caused by the missing of diurnal source cycles. The coal combustion, microbial activity, and lubricating oil combustion factors were identified and well explained at the same study location and were not major sources of BrC (Gou et al., 2021; M. Xie et al., 2022b; Z. Xu et al., 2022). The stacked factor contributions of the PMF total and PMF summer solutions reasonably reflected the diurnal patterns of input species (Figure 5 and Figure S9 in Supporting Information ), but the peak values were usually underestimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…To evaluate the light absorption per unit mass of WSOC, the solution mass absorption efficiency (MAE λ , w , m 2 g −1 C) was calculated as follows MAEλ,w=Absλ,wCWSOC ${\text{MAE}}_{\lambda ,w}=\frac{{\text{Abs}}_{\lambda ,w}}{{C}_{\text{WSOC}}}$ where C WSOC denotes ambient concentrations of WSOC (μg m −3 ). Since WIOC shows stronger light absorption than WSOC at the same location (M. Xie et al., 2022b), one fourth of each filter sample was extracted in 12 mL methanol. After filtration, the light absorbance ( A λ , m ), light absorption coefficient (Abs λ , m , Mm −1 ), and solution mass absorption efficiency (MAE λ , m , m 2 g −1 C) of the methanol extracts were determined in the same manner as those of the water extracts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations