2021
DOI: 10.21744/ijllc.v7n1.1143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collocational choices in the discourse activities of select paramilitary formations in Nigeria

Abstract: This paper investigated the collocational choices used among three Nigerian paramilitary formations in their official discourse activities with a view to ascertaining the contextual meanings of the lexical choices. Data for the study were collected by means of participant observation and key informant interview (KII) of randomly selected segments of members in the office environment, patrol duties and muster parades. The findings showed that personnel of the formations used peculiar collocational choices in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such contexts, the meaning of the emotional expressions and the stance they insinuate are context-dependent, and construed in the differences in appraisal patterns. Uwen [25,26] , and Uwen and Ellah [27] argue that this conception helps to convey situated meanings that define the social context which are only comprehensible to the interlocutors. Meaning here, according to Ukam and Uwen [28] is emphasized in the tone, stress and choice of words by participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such contexts, the meaning of the emotional expressions and the stance they insinuate are context-dependent, and construed in the differences in appraisal patterns. Uwen [25,26] , and Uwen and Ellah [27] argue that this conception helps to convey situated meanings that define the social context which are only comprehensible to the interlocutors. Meaning here, according to Ukam and Uwen [28] is emphasized in the tone, stress and choice of words by participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%