Colloidal Mechanisms of Gold Nanoparticle Loss in Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation

Abstract

Flow field-flow fractionation is a powerful method for the analysis of nanoparticle size distributions, but its widespread use has been hampered by large analyte losses, especially of metal nanoparticles. Here, we report on the colloidal mechanisms underlying the losses. We systematically studied gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) during asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) by systematic variation of the particle properties and the eluent composition. Recoveries of AuNPs (core diameter 12 nm) stabilized by citrate or polyethylene glycol (PEG) at different ionic strengths were determined. We used online UV-vis detection and off-line elementary analysis to follow particle losses during full analysis runs, runs without cross-flow, and runs with parts of the instrument bypassed. The combination allowed us to calculate relative and absolute analyte losses at different stages of the analytic protocol. We found different loss mechanisms depending on the ligand. Citrate-stabilized particles degraded during analysis and suffered large losses (up to 74%). PEG-stabilized particles had smaller relative losses at moderate ionic strengths (1-20%) that depended on PEG length. Long PEGs at higher ionic strengths (≥5 mM) caused particle loss due to bridging adsorption at the membrane. Bulk agglomeration was not a relevant loss mechanism at low ionic strengths ≤5 mM for any of the studied particles. An unexpectedly large fraction of particles was lost at tubing and other internal surfaces. We propose that the colloidal mechanisms observed here are relevant loss mechanisms in many particle analysis protocols and discuss strategies to avoid them.

An online monitor of the oxidative capacity of aerosols (o-MOCA)

“…A study conducted by Matas et al (2004) has shown that neutrally buoyant particles are driven away from walls in a laminar tube flow when particle dimensions approach those of the tube diameter. Jochem et al (2016) found that transport of particles in microfluidic devices and losses in comparable PEEK tubing were negligible. Based on these considerations and studies, we assume there is little opportunity for water-encapsulated particles to be lost to surfaces during both collection into water and transport.…”

Effects of polyethylene glycol on the surface of nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery

“…PEG on the surface of NPs is responsible for colloidal stability through steric repulsion. This steric repulsion is more evident for PEG with a higher MW [90][91][92][93] . The reason is that the distance between two NPs increases with the increase of the length of PEG chains, thus enhancing the steric repulsion of PEG and avoiding the aggregation of NPs 94 .…”

Liquid biopsy technologies based on membrane microfluidics: High‐yield purification and selective quantification of biomarkers in nanocarriers

“…AF4 has high throughput but analyte loss (recovery rate) is always an issue, as the exosomes are driven toward one side of the channel and across it. A recent study with nanoparticles [44] shows a loss as much as 74%. Yet another size‐based technology is the Nanoscale Deterministic Lateral Displacement (NDLD) technology [21] that uses nanopillars to laterally deflect EVs in a flowing stream.…”