2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2012.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collusion in experimental Bertrand duopolies with convex costs: The role of cost asymmetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this static model where firms decide simultaneously, the Nash equilibrium play implies A standard measure of collusion consists in measuring the extent to which firms manage to increase their profits above the Nash equilibrium profits and come closer to cartel profits (Holt (1995), Argenton and Müller (2012)). The collusion index (θ) is defined as follows:…”
Section: Markets Treatments and Theoretical Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this static model where firms decide simultaneously, the Nash equilibrium play implies A standard measure of collusion consists in measuring the extent to which firms manage to increase their profits above the Nash equilibrium profits and come closer to cartel profits (Holt (1995), Argenton and Müller (2012)). The collusion index (θ) is defined as follows:…”
Section: Markets Treatments and Theoretical Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This integer is drawn from a uniform distribution over [1,25]. If the integer drawn is 1, then an "event" occurs.…”
Section: Appendix (Not For Publication)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Boone et al (2012), who find prices close to the marginal cost of the less e cient firm, while other experimental studies on Bertrand oligopolies with asymmetric costs find prices above the Nash equilibrium (Dugar and Mitra, 2016;Argenton and Müller, 2012). An important di erence between our design and these studies is that, in our case, the entrant faces fixed costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…5. Compared to when firms are symmetric, asymmetric costs result in lower prices (Mason et al, 1992;Mason and Phillips, 1997;Fonseca and Normann, 2008;Dugar and Mitra, 2009;Argenton and Müller, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%