Colombia, an unknown genetic diversity in the era of Big Data

Abstract

BackgroundLatin America harbors some of the most biodiverse countries in the world, including Colombia. Despite the increasing use of cutting-edge technologies in genomics and bioinformatics in several biological science fields around the world, the region has fallen behind in the inclusion of these approaches in biodiversity studies. In this study, we used data mining methods to search in four main public databases of genetic sequences such as: NCBI Nucleotide and BioProject, Pathosystems Resource Integration Center, and Barcode of Life Data Systems databases. We aimed to determine how much of the Colombian biodiversity is contained in genetic data stored in these public databases and how much of this information has been generated by national institutions. Additionally, we compared this data for Colombia with other countries of high biodiversity in Latin America, such as Brazil, Argentina, Costa Rica, Mexico, and Peru.ResultsIn Nucleotide, we found that 66.84% of total records for Colombia have been published at the national level, and this data represents less than 5% of the total number of species reported for the country. In BioProject, 70.46% of records were generated by national institutions and the great majority of them is represented by microorganisms. In BOLD Systems, 26% of records have been submitted by national institutions, representing 258 species for Colombia. This number of species reported for Colombia span approximately 0.46% of the total biodiversity reported for the country (56,343 species). Finally, in PATRIC database, 13.25% of the reported sequences were contributed by national institutions. Colombia has a better biodiversity representation in public databases in comparison to other Latin American countries, like Costa Rica and Peru. Mexico and Argentina have the highest representation of species at the national level, despite Brazil and Colombia, which actually hold the first and second places in biodiversity worldwide.ConclusionsOur findings show gaps in the representation of the Colombian biodiversity at the molecular and genetic levels in widely consulted public databases. National funding for high-throughput molecular research, NGS technologies costs, and access to genetic resources are limiting factors. This fact should be taken as an opportunity to foster the development of collaborative projects between research groups in the Latin American region to study the vast biodiversity of these countries using ‘omics’ technologies.

The impact of engineering students' performance in the first three years on their graduation result using educational data mining

“…The discovery of hidden information is achieved by running data mining algorithms that combine statistics with computer science to mine valuable information from a seemingly meaningless data jumble. Data mining can be applied in various fields such as engineering (Adekitan et al., 2019; Saini and Aggarwal, 2018), business management (Zuo et al., 2016), marketing and product design (Jin et al., 2019), computer science (Mahendra et al., 2019), education (Ibrahim et al., 2019; Porouhan, 2018), genetics (Noreña et al., 2018), biological studies (Gu et al., 2018), facility maintenance management (Miguel-Cruz et al., 2019), health and drug development studies (Keserci et al., 2017), chemistry and toxicity analysis (Saini and Srivastava, 2019), meteorology (Kovalchuk et al., 2019), transportation safety (Divya et al., 2019) and traffic management (Amiruzzaman, 2019), fraud detection (Vardhani et al., 2019), and so forth. In the educational sector, volumes of data are daily generated from various teaching and learning activities within an institution.…”

Rapid mitochondrial genome sequencing based on Oxford Nanopore Sequencing and a proxy for vertebrate species identification

“…Species identification efforts have drastically being influenced by the use of molecular data acting as a complement to taxonomic information obtained from morphology alone (Camargo & Sites, 2013; Carstens et al, 2013; Luo, Ling, Ho, & Zhu, 2018); however, the availability of molecular datasets (genes or genomes) is still restricted to particular biotic groups, while many others—in which high diversity occurs—lack proper molecular information, hindering the ability of addressing evolutionary questions, biogeographic hypothesis, and accurate species delimitation and identification (Helmy, Awad, & Mosa, 2016; Noreña, González Muñoz, Mosquera‐Rendón, Botero, & Cristancho, 2018). Traditional barcoding approaches have proven useful for species identification (Barco, Raupach, Laakmann, Neumann, & Knebelsberger, 2016; Hebert, Ratnasingham, et al, 2003), but they are not suitable for certain taxa lacking reference genomes or specific primers for PCR amplification when universal primers do not work as expected (Ford et al, 2009; Moulton, Song, & Whiting, 2010; Pino‐Bodas, Martín, Burgaz, & Lumbsch, 2013).…”

Big data, farmacoepidemiología y farmacovigilancia

“…However, there is still a long way to go, 29 especially in Latin America, where this type of technology is underdeveloped in the areas of natural sciences and health. [30][31][32] Even with the benefits they offer, these techniques have limitations, including the lack of quality standards and validation methods for some of their records, as they may be incomplete, inconsistent, and subject to a great deal of potential bias and confusion. On the other hand, the use of massive amounts of data may cause an existing relationship to go undetected due to the masking or dilution of a phenomenon.…”