2020
DOI: 10.3390/antiox9100955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colon Bioaccessibility under In Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion of a Red Cabbage Extract Chemically Profiled through UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS

Abstract: Red cabbage is a native vegetable of the Mediterranean region that represents one of the major sources of anthocyanins. The aim of this research is to evaluate the antioxidant capability and total polyphenol content (TPC) of a red cabbage extract and to compare acquired data with those from the same extract encapsulated in an acid-resistant capsule. The extract, which was qualitatively and quantitatively profiled by UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS analysis, contained a high content of anthocyanins and phenolic acids, wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the extract contained in AR capsules showed a significantly higher TPC value and antioxidant activity in both the duodenal and colonic phases (considered as Viscozyme L phase plus Pronase E phase) when compared with NAR samples. Interestingly, Izzo et al [38] have reported that red cabbage extract encapsulated in AR capsule after in vitro gastrointestinal digestion showed higher colon bioaccessibility when compared to the extract digested without a capsule. Similar results have been observed by Amrani-Allalou et al [39], who reported a strong decrease in TPC value during gastrointestinal digestion in non-encapsulated medicinal plant extracts compared to the same extracts containing in AR capsules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, the extract contained in AR capsules showed a significantly higher TPC value and antioxidant activity in both the duodenal and colonic phases (considered as Viscozyme L phase plus Pronase E phase) when compared with NAR samples. Interestingly, Izzo et al [38] have reported that red cabbage extract encapsulated in AR capsule after in vitro gastrointestinal digestion showed higher colon bioaccessibility when compared to the extract digested without a capsule. Similar results have been observed by Amrani-Allalou et al [39], who reported a strong decrease in TPC value during gastrointestinal digestion in non-encapsulated medicinal plant extracts compared to the same extracts containing in AR capsules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, Izzo et al [ 38 ] have reported that red cabbage extract encapsulated in AR capsule after in vitro gastrointestinal digestion showed higher colon bioaccessibility when compared to the extract digested without a capsule. Similar results have been observed by Amrani-Allalou et al [ 39 ], who reported a strong decrease in TPC value during gastrointestinal digestion in non-encapsulated medicinal plant extracts compared to the same extracts containing in AR capsules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coffee brews samples were brought under successive oral, gastric, and intestinal in vitro digestion, following an harmonized procedure recently created by the COST action INFOGEST network [ 26 ]. Simulated digestion fluids, namely gastric fluid (SGF), salivary fluid (SSF), and intestinal fluid (SIF) were built considering a previously described procedure [ 27 ] and showed in Supplementary Materials , Table S1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, to determine the bioaccessibility of the polyphenolic fraction and the antioxidant capacity in the colon stage, the remaining pellet was subjected to the previously described procedure [ 27 ]. First, 5 mL of 1 mg/mL Pronase E solution was added, and the pH was readjusted to 8 using NaOH 1M, simulating the action of the gut microbiota.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FRAP method was conducted according to the procedure described by Izzo et al [42]. As reported, the FRAP solution was prepared by adding 2.5 mL of acetate buffer, 0.25 mL of TPTZ in HCL, and 0.25 mL of a 20 mM of FeCl 3 solution.…”
Section: Frap Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%