1914
DOI: 10.2307/1836116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonial Commerce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This possible introduction from the Azores should be confirmed with more comprehensive sampling and additional DNA sequence information to provide a robust phylogenetic framework. We suggest that this introduction could have been associated with commerce with Britain after the arrival of the first settlers in the Azores (1420–1430) (Andrews, ). This explanation is feasible, given the remarkable plasticity of this species in adapting to feeding on many different plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This possible introduction from the Azores should be confirmed with more comprehensive sampling and additional DNA sequence information to provide a robust phylogenetic framework. We suggest that this introduction could have been associated with commerce with Britain after the arrival of the first settlers in the Azores (1420–1430) (Andrews, ). This explanation is feasible, given the remarkable plasticity of this species in adapting to feeding on many different plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Sokolo to explain di erences in economic development across regions within countries. 6 Engerman and Sokolo brie y mention that countries with good endowments tend to have more dencentralized political institutions (Gallego, 2006, provides evidence supporting this idea). But they do not discuss the implications that decentralization of political power may have for development at the sub-national level.…”
Section: This Paper Builds On the Arguments Developed By Acemoglu Et Al And Engerman Andmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is deeply misleading in that it suggests that this construction of an absence somehow reflects an underlying reality, namely that ‘there had been no past failures that could serve as a lesson about what not to do’ and that ‘there was no collective experience’ (Hudec, 1987: 6–7). By most accounts, trade had been a central aspect of colonial relations (Andrews, 1914: 48; Marley, 1938; Barnes, 1938; Rist, 2010: 52). And even though the development discourse admitted of neither a past nor a present of colonialism, echoes of the colonial experience are evident both in what the development discourse embraces and in what it rejects.…”
Section: The History and Future Of The Trading Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%