2012
DOI: 10.1080/13507486.2012.697874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonial encounters, local knowledge and the making of the cartographic archive in the Venetian Peloponnese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pratt’s (1992: 7) account of the contact zone thus prioritizes the dimensions of encounter that were largely overlooked by the accounts of domination and conquest characteristic of early travel writing and exploration (Rovisco, 2010). It therefore offers a critical perspective on the unequal exchanges and ‘material and cultural costs of colonialism’, whilst not overlooking the agency, participation and resistance of colonized and indigenous people (Nash, 2002: 221; Shaw et al, 2006; Stouraiti, 2012). Because of the emphasis placed on the links between encounter, unequal exchange and pedagogy, the ‘contact zone’ has been used to examine other settings, including spaces of education and research (Besio, 2003; Elmborg, 2006; Manathunga, 2009).…”
Section: Diversity Difference and Bordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pratt’s (1992: 7) account of the contact zone thus prioritizes the dimensions of encounter that were largely overlooked by the accounts of domination and conquest characteristic of early travel writing and exploration (Rovisco, 2010). It therefore offers a critical perspective on the unequal exchanges and ‘material and cultural costs of colonialism’, whilst not overlooking the agency, participation and resistance of colonized and indigenous people (Nash, 2002: 221; Shaw et al, 2006; Stouraiti, 2012). Because of the emphasis placed on the links between encounter, unequal exchange and pedagogy, the ‘contact zone’ has been used to examine other settings, including spaces of education and research (Besio, 2003; Elmborg, 2006; Manathunga, 2009).…”
Section: Diversity Difference and Bordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encounters can also produce anxiety, fear, resentment or violence (Hou, 2016; Listerborn, 2015). They can harden prejudice, affirm and (re)produce binary logics, aggravate existing conflicts or re-enact unequal power relations (Allen, 2004; Lobo, 2013; Stouraiti, 2012). Indeed, recognition of the negative potentials of encounters has led to well-documented efforts to restrict, minimize or prevent them (Schuermans, 2016b).…”
Section: Diversity Difference and Bordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of encounters has been used to examine contact between groups distinct in terms of social identity and categorisation, which imply some form of potential conflict, prejudice or unease (Valentine, 2008; Wilson, 2017). Encounters hold the potential for changing intergroup relations, either by chipping away from prejudices and misconceptions about others and producing new convivialities (Leitner, 2012; Schuermans, 2013; Vertovec, 2015; Wilson, 2017), or by reaffirming prejudice, producing resentment, aggravating conflicts and reinforcing unequal power relations (Lobo, 2013; Stouraiti, 2012; Wilson, 2017). Yet these encounters do not take place in a vacuum, but in the presence of historically produced configurations of power and status (Vertovec, 2021).…”
Section: Place Local Migrant Housing Policies and Well‐beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact zones offer travellers and 'travelees' an opportunity to develop relations in 'co-presence, interaction, interlocking understandings and practices' (Pratt, 2008 p. 8) and may be a means to create third spaces for common empathetic understanding in places of conflict. Geographers have also recognised the potential that encounters pose to investigate multiculturalism (Nagel & Hopkins, 2010), colonisation, and indigenous peoples (Stouraiti, 2012) as sites 'of destabilization … co-constitution, improvisation and interaction' (Wilson, 2017, p. 457).…”
Section: Contact Zones and Liminalitymentioning
confidence: 99%