Colonial New Jersey's provincial fiscal structure, 1704–1775: spending obligations, revenue sources, and tax burdens during peace and war

Abstract

I reconstitute the spending obligations and revenue sources of colonial New Jersey's provincial government for the years 1704 through 1775 from primary sources using forensic accounting techniques. I identify and analyze the methods for raising revenue to meet normal peacetime and emergency wartime expenses. I calculate the provincial tax burdens imposed on New Jersey's citizens. I identify how Britain interfered with New Jersey's fiscal structure. I estimate what the revenues and tax burdens would have been without this interference. New Jersey paid for war expenses by issuing bills of credit, spreading the tax burden of redeeming these bills into the future. New Jersey paid its yearly administrative costs with current property taxes and with current interest earnings from loaning paper money. In the absence of British interference and wars, New Jersey could have driven tax burdens to zero by using interest earnings to pay for all its provincial administrative costs.

Surge, retraction and prices: the performance of fiat coins in Sweden, c. 1715–1720

“…Instead, factors such as time discounting, the imposition of tax liabilities for early redemption and credible government backing of the notes determined their value. Others have recognised rising price levels, but they argue that paper money increased monetisation and subsequently spearheaded economic growth (Smith 1985; Wicker 1985; Rousseau and Stroup 2011; Michener 2015; Grubb 2016a, 2016b).…”

Economic History, Historical Analysis, and the “New History of Capitalism”

“… 23 The contributions of Farley Grubb on colonial fiscal and monetary affairs show that the pre-industrial economies of North America were subject to tremendous volatility (Grubb 2016a, 2016b). …”