2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2010.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonialism and conservation: Commercialisation of forests and decline of tribals in Madras Presidency, 1882–1947

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThis article attempts to analyse the colonial forest policy and its impact on the environment and tribals in Madras Presidency during the post-Forest Act period . During this period, the colonial regime has actively encouraged commercialisation of forest resources while several restrictions were clamped up on the tribals and other forest users. Here it is argued that the initiatives of the state towards conservation were primarily intended to curtail the access enjoyed by tribals and other fores… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is perhaps not until the introduction of the 'Grow More Food' campaign in South India including South Canara between 1940-50 that new opportunities in agriculture arose (Kumar, 2005). Particularly as the practice of 'reserve forest' excluded local tribals from traditional settings, was reinforced in by the Madras Preservation of private Forest Act which resulted in increased non-tribal, that is, caste settlement of forest (see George and Chattopadhyay, 2001;Saravanan, 2011). Prior to this point as Kakada (1949:2) noted, agriculture was only practised close to the coast and the bottoms of innumerable valleys of rich alluvial soil, which wind among laterite hills and plateaus from the Ghats to the sea.…”
Section: Arguments From Silencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is perhaps not until the introduction of the 'Grow More Food' campaign in South India including South Canara between 1940-50 that new opportunities in agriculture arose (Kumar, 2005). Particularly as the practice of 'reserve forest' excluded local tribals from traditional settings, was reinforced in by the Madras Preservation of private Forest Act which resulted in increased non-tribal, that is, caste settlement of forest (see George and Chattopadhyay, 2001;Saravanan, 2011). Prior to this point as Kakada (1949:2) noted, agriculture was only practised close to the coast and the bottoms of innumerable valleys of rich alluvial soil, which wind among laterite hills and plateaus from the Ghats to the sea.…”
Section: Arguments From Silencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even after the introduction of the reserve forest, particularly after the 1880s, the forest department had continued with it more systematically until the close of the colonial period. 11 However, illicit felling does not find mention in the government records. Most probably it would not have received the attention of the then administration, since the prices were very low the sandalwood processing industries were also almost non-existent in the country during that period.…”
Section: State Institutions and Atrocities On Tribalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is to be noted that over 90% of tribal households in various hills of Madras presidency possessed modest land holdings, which became reserve forest with the implementation of Madras Forest Act 1882. (Saravanan 2017). Narayan undertakes the role of a counter historian through the representation of tribal alienation that happened due to the implementation of forest policies in India.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%