1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02237098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonic pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection

Abstract: Both forms of reconstruction have similar satisfactory long-term functional results. The major advantage of colonic pouch was seen in the immediate postoperative phase.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
76
0
12

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
76
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the sigmoid colon is an established area of high pressure and this may contribute to the perceived poor function. The descending colon may therefore be a preferable site for reconstruction 13,14) We conclude that the STE anastomosis results in comparable functional outcomes to a colonic J-pouch and superior outcomes to the ETE anastomosis in the immediate postoperative period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the sigmoid colon is an established area of high pressure and this may contribute to the perceived poor function. The descending colon may therefore be a preferable site for reconstruction 13,14) We conclude that the STE anastomosis results in comparable functional outcomes to a colonic J-pouch and superior outcomes to the ETE anastomosis in the immediate postoperative period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A new method of reconstruction called coloplasty seems to produce superior functional outcomes compared with straight anastomosis loll) A second alternative to the J-pouch after low anterior resection is a simple side-to-end (STE) anastomosis 12,13) The present study compared the functional and surgical outcomes of an STE anastomosis, a colonic J-pouch (CJP) reconstruction, and end-to-end anastomosis (ETE) Each patient underwent laboratory studies of anal sphincter function before and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. When a diverting stoma was fashioned in the primary operation, the laboratory studies were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after closure of the stoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Это основные типы толстокишечных резервуаров, применя-емые сегодня. Все они достоверно улучшают функциональ-ное состояние больных в послеоперационном периоде и по своей эффективности примерно сопоставимы [13,14,15]. В данной статье представлено клиническое наблюдение формирования поперечного толстокишечного резерву-ара у больной раком нижнеампулярного отдела прямой кишки после неоадъювантной химиолучевой терапии и последующей резекции прямой кишки с тотальной ме-зоректумэктомией.…”
Section: инновационная малоинвазивная колопроктологияunclassified
“…Building on successful experience with the ileoanal pouch in familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis following proctocolectomy, the colonic J pouch was introduced by Lazorthes and Parc (26,125) The clinical results and manometric data have been compared with straight colorectal and coloanal anastomosis in controlled studies, including numerous randomized trials (29,33,41,54,56,63,88,100,122,123,143,146). According to a meta-analysis (49), the CJP has unique advantages compared with straight coloanal anastomosis: Bowel movement was significantly less up to 2 years after surgery, significantly fewer patients suffered from an imperative urge to defecate up to one year post-operatively and significantly fewer patients had to take antidiarrheals.…”
Section: Colon J Pouch (Cjp)mentioning
confidence: 99%