2013
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonization of islands in the Mona Passage by endemic dwarf geckoes (genus Sphaerodactylus) reconstructed with mitochondrial phylogeny

Abstract: Little is known about the natural history of the Sphaerodactylus species endemic to the three islands located in the Mona Passage separating the Greater Antillean islands of Hispaniola and Puerto Rico. In this study, parts of two mitochondrial genes, 16S rRNA and 12S rRNA, were sequenced to determine the relationships between the sphaerodactylids that live in the Mona Passage and other Caribbean species from the same genus. While the main goal was to identify the biogeographical origin of these species, we als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, S. nicholsi and S. townsendi are not sister taxa and an S. nicholsi sensu lato that includes a synonymized S. townsendi would be rendered paraphyletic by both S. monensis and S. levinsi (Figure 1a). However, these results do conflict with the only previously published molecular genetic phylogeny for this group, which found S. townsendi samples nested deep within S. nicholsi to the exclusion of both S. monensis and S. levinsi (Díaz-Lameiro et al 2013). To resolve this discrepancy, we briefly reanalyzed Díaz-Lameiro et al's (2013) 16S sequence data but added several vouchered S. townsendi specimens we collected from populations allopatric with respect to S. nicholsi.…”
Section: Species Phylogeny and Species Delimitationmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, S. nicholsi and S. townsendi are not sister taxa and an S. nicholsi sensu lato that includes a synonymized S. townsendi would be rendered paraphyletic by both S. monensis and S. levinsi (Figure 1a). However, these results do conflict with the only previously published molecular genetic phylogeny for this group, which found S. townsendi samples nested deep within S. nicholsi to the exclusion of both S. monensis and S. levinsi (Díaz-Lameiro et al 2013). To resolve this discrepancy, we briefly reanalyzed Díaz-Lameiro et al's (2013) 16S sequence data but added several vouchered S. townsendi specimens we collected from populations allopatric with respect to S. nicholsi.…”
Section: Species Phylogeny and Species Delimitationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…To resolve this discrepancy, we briefly reanalyzed Díaz-Lameiro et al's (2013) 16S sequence data but added several vouchered S. townsendi specimens we collected from populations allopatric with respect to S. nicholsi. This revised phylogeny indicates the 2 S. townsendi specimens used in Díaz-Lameiro et al (2013) were misidentified S. nicholsi (Supplementary Figure 9). Thus, resolving this phylogenetic discrepancy and rejecting the hypothesis that S. townsendi and S. nicholsi form a clade to the exclusion of S. monensis and S. levinsi.…”
Section: Species Phylogeny and Species Delimitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Díaz-Lameiro et al, 2013;Rodríguez-Robles et al, 2007), and421 Chilabothrus boas could have also reached Mona in this manner.422 The disjunct range of C. monensis s.l. (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%