2016
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonoscopy-guided therapy for the prevention of post-operative recurrence of Crohn’s disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, an endoscopic evaluation with ileocolonoscopy is recommended 6 to 12 months after surgery [25]. Nevertheless, whether endoscopic monitoring and prophylactic therapy guided by colonoscopy are beneficial compared to empirical initiation shortly after surgery is still a matter of debate [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, an endoscopic evaluation with ileocolonoscopy is recommended 6 to 12 months after surgery [25]. Nevertheless, whether endoscopic monitoring and prophylactic therapy guided by colonoscopy are beneficial compared to empirical initiation shortly after surgery is still a matter of debate [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of early postoperative endoscopy is recommended in the guidelines of several IBD scientific societies because of the predictive value of endoscopic recurrence on subsequent clinical relapse [ 7 , 10 , 24 ], there is little data in the literature on its use and its impact on the clinical outcome of patients. A recent Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of colonoscopy-guided post-operative treatment suggested a trend toward a lower clinical recurrence and toward a lower endoscopic activity score at 18 months [ 16 ]. However, the main conclusion was that there was insufficient data and that particularly the impact on surgical recurrence had not been appropriately studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case-control and cohort studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) [19] consisting of three domains: (1) selection of subjects, (2) comparability of groups, and (3) assessment of outcome. A score of 0-9 was allocated to each relevant study.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%