2012
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1108895
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colonoscopy versus Fecal Immunochemical Testing in Colorectal-Cancer Screening

Abstract: Subjects in the FIT group were more likely to participate in screening than were those in the colonoscopy group. On the baseline screening examination, the numbers of subjects in whom colorectal cancer was detected were similar in the two study groups, but more adenomas were identified in the colonoscopy group. (Funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00906997.).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

13
507
11
18

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 771 publications
(549 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
13
507
11
18
Order By: Relevance
“…In einzelnen randomisierten Studien konnte zudem gezeigt werden, dass trotz geringerer Teilnahmerate im Vergleich zum FOBT durch sowohl Sigmoidoskopie [103] als auch Koloskopie [104] in einer intention-to-screen-Analyse mehr fortgeschrittene Neoplasien detektiert werden, was vor allem durch die deutlich höhere Sensitivität für fortgeschrittene Adenome bedingt war. …”
Section: Endoskopische Verfahrenunclassified
“…In einzelnen randomisierten Studien konnte zudem gezeigt werden, dass trotz geringerer Teilnahmerate im Vergleich zum FOBT durch sowohl Sigmoidoskopie [103] als auch Koloskopie [104] in einer intention-to-screen-Analyse mehr fortgeschrittene Neoplasien detektiert werden, was vor allem durch die deutlich höhere Sensitivität für fortgeschrittene Adenome bedingt war. …”
Section: Endoskopische Verfahrenunclassified
“…In a recent study of average-risk US population, the diagnostic yield of DCBE for advanced adenoma and CRC was 6.2% and 0.7%, respectively (Kung et al, 2006). Meanwhile, the incidence of colorectal neoplasm detected during screening colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing in a large number of asymptomatic European adults 50 to 69 years of age was 1.9% and 0.9% for advanced adenoma, and 0.1% for CRC, respectively (Quintero et al, 2012). Technique of barium study and the interpretation of the findings on DCBE examination by radiologists also affect the accuracy of CRC detection.…”
Section: 1273 Colorectal Cancer Screening By Double Contrast Barium mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the availability of various CRC screening options, the fact is that half of all US adults aged 50 years or more are not up to date with national screening guidelines, and screening rates are particularly low among vulnerable groups, such as the medically underserved, racial/ethnic minorities, and recent immigrants [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immune fecal occult blood testing (iFOBT) is a relatively new, cheaper, more accessible, yet still effective screening alternative, which is cost effective while still resulting in a 30 % reduction in CRC mortality [12]. It may be both more acceptable than colonoscopy to immigrants and more practical for underserved patients, who are often treated in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) where colonoscopy is often not available [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%