Color and conventional image‐directed Doppler ultrasonography: Accuracy and sources of error in quantitative blood flow measurements

Abstract

Accuracy of two systems--conventional (DRF 400, Diasonics) and color-coded (Angiodynograph, Quantum/Phillips) image-directed Doppler ultrasonography--was investigated using an in vitro model that generated both monophasic and triphasic pulsatile flow patterns. Estimated and actual blood volume flow rates showed good correlations, but the sampling with a hand-held transducer led to wide variations in measurement error for the conventional (-69.2% to 50%) and the color-coded (-79.3% to 265.7%) systems. By performing multiple measurements, one could improve accuracy considering only the maximal values of a series instead of the mean values. Accuracy was impaired by interposed muscular or fatty tissue due to false low time-average velocity measurements caused by a loss of Doppler signal. Comparison of both systems revealed significant differences between pulsatility index values (p less than 0.001), blood flow velocities (p less than 0.001), and blood volume flow rates (p less than 0.05 for program flow, p less than 0.001 for manual and automatic flow program of the color-coded system).

Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery

“…For the present study, a PSVR of Ն2.5 was chosen based on studies suggesting that a PSVR of Ͼ2.4 to 2.5 is more accurate and specific for the detection of Ͼ50% stenosis than the traditional criteria of PSVR Ն2.0. [31][32][33] …”

Venous haemodynamics after total knee arthroplasty

“…Measurements of peak venous velocity are much more accurate and reproducible than determinations of volume, especially in the venous system. 50,73 Veins are elastic and distensible, which makes calculations of volume less accurate. 50,73 In addition, the measurement of turbulent flow, generated by pulsatile pneumatic compression devices, is more difficult and less predictable than that of laminar flow.…”

“…50,73 Veins are elastic and distensible, which makes calculations of volume less accurate. 50,73 In addition, the measurement of turbulent flow, generated by pulsatile pneumatic compression devices, is more difficult and less predictable than that of laminar flow. 73 Sources of error in quantitative Doppler measurements of blood flow may occur, and the reduction of these errors depends on the exact assessments of the vessel diameter and time-average velocity.…”

Standardization of Carotid Ultrasound

“…6 Until now, ultrasound laboratories had to validate their velocity criteria angiographically on an individual basis to normalize for interequipment variability. 4,5 The ratio of internal to common carotid artery peak velocity was proposed for compensation of interindividual and interequipment variability. 6,7 Our data (Table 1) and that MVR indicates mean velocity ratio (intrastenotic mean velocity divided by the distal cervical internal carotid mean velocity); PPV, positive predictive value; and NPV, negative predictive value.…”

“…Doppler ultrasound, as a noninvasive screening modality for severe carotid stenosis, allows angiography to be used more selectively. 3 Because of significant instrument variability, 4,5 individual centers have to validate their device-specific cut-off values angiographically. The ratio of the internal carotid artery to common carotid artery velocity (ICA/CCA ratio) should normalize for patient variation and instrument variability.…”