2016
DOI: 10.1111/eth.12533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Color Assortative Mating in a Mainland Population of the Poison Frog Oophaga pumilio

Abstract: Assortative mating is a reproductive strategy used by a diversity of animals, in which individuals choose a mate that shares similar characteristics. This mating strategy has the potential to promote the evolution of various sexual signals and has been a proposed mechanism driving and maintaining color variation in the anuran family Dendrobatidae. Most studies have examined this reproductive strategy in the polytypic poison frog, Oophaga pumilio, in the Bocas del Toro archipelago in Panama. Little attention, h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over time, color ornament-fitness linkages may thus diverge between males and females, making it important for studies to explore those linkages in both sexes to better understand the drivers and consequences of non-random mating behavior and, more importantly, the evolutionary significance of color assortment behavior (or lack thereof). Between our two studies on U. ornatus, we found no evidence of assortment, even though color-assortative mating has been identified in other polymorphic systems (but see Acord, Anthony, & Hickerson, 2013;Gade et al, 2016;Pérez i de Lanuza et al, 2013;Pryke & Griffith, 2007). We also recognize that we are unable to rule out the possibility that mating preferences are temporally flexible in U. ornatus, such that mate preferences by either sex vary from season to season or by year (e.g., Chaine & Lyon, 2008).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over time, color ornament-fitness linkages may thus diverge between males and females, making it important for studies to explore those linkages in both sexes to better understand the drivers and consequences of non-random mating behavior and, more importantly, the evolutionary significance of color assortment behavior (or lack thereof). Between our two studies on U. ornatus, we found no evidence of assortment, even though color-assortative mating has been identified in other polymorphic systems (but see Acord, Anthony, & Hickerson, 2013;Gade et al, 2016;Pérez i de Lanuza et al, 2013;Pryke & Griffith, 2007). We also recognize that we are unable to rule out the possibility that mating preferences are temporally flexible in U. ornatus, such that mate preferences by either sex vary from season to season or by year (e.g., Chaine & Lyon, 2008).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This clear covariation between male quality and choosiness in blue males may also partly drive sexual selection on female ornamentation in U. ornatus (e.g., Fitzpatrick & Servedio, 2017). The contribution of male preference to mating dynamics in other polymorphic species, as well as the extent of its association with any inferred morph behavioral strategies, remains unclear (e.g., Gade, Hill, & Saporito, 2016;Pérez i de Lanuza et al, 2013;Yang, Richards-Zawacki, Devar, & Dugas, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Call parameters across the red–blue transition zone do not differ among populations or colour morphs (M. L. Dye, unpublished data ), so we used the same call in all trials (see Supporting Information for details). This design enabled us to control the stimuli and take notes from > 1.5 m away, a distance that does not disturb males (Staudt et al ., ; Gade et al ., ). All trials were recorded using a video camera (icools Black Wifi Sports Camera) mounted on the stimulus apparatus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Even though in this study, the frogs were situated in a no‐choice situation, it demonstrates that females accept nonassortative partners when no color‐assortative partners are present. Up to now, only one study conducted behavioral observations of natural, not manipulated mating behavior in the field and confirmed dorsal color‐assortative mating in a mainland population in Costa Rica (Gade, Hill, & Saporito, ). Thus, research investigating natural mate choice under field conditions is still scarce (Dreher & Pröhl, ; Gade et al., ; Richards‐Zawacki et al., ), and is explicitly addressed here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%