2010
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.73541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Color Doppler evaluation of left gastric vein hemodynamics in cirrhosis with portal hypertension and its correlation with esophageal varices and variceal bleed

Abstract: Aim:The purpose of this study was to assess the value of Doppler evaluation of left gastric vein hemodynamics when monitoring portal hypertension patients, by correlating Doppler ultrasonography (USG) parameters with the severity of esophageal varices and occurrence of variceal bleeding.Methods:This study was carried out on 100 patients using Doppler USG and endoscopy. Forty-seven of these were patients with cirrhosis with portal hypertension, who had not had a recent variceal bleed (group 1) and 26 were patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the development of imaging technology, magnetic resonance (MR) portography has been described as being comparable to endoscopy for the detection of esophageal varices due to its short acquisition time, high signal‐to‐noise ratio and no radiation . It can not only visualize the anatomical distributions of the varices, but also can analyze the inflowing vein of the varices (LGV) and its originating vein which play important roles in the formation and development of the varices . Furthermore, cirrhotic patients often receive hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance with MR imaging which could be used as a “one‐stop‐shop” approach evaluating the varices at the same time without the need for a second study .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the development of imaging technology, magnetic resonance (MR) portography has been described as being comparable to endoscopy for the detection of esophageal varices due to its short acquisition time, high signal‐to‐noise ratio and no radiation . It can not only visualize the anatomical distributions of the varices, but also can analyze the inflowing vein of the varices (LGV) and its originating vein which play important roles in the formation and development of the varices . Furthermore, cirrhotic patients often receive hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance with MR imaging which could be used as a “one‐stop‐shop” approach evaluating the varices at the same time without the need for a second study .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M ASSIVE HEMORRHAGE OF the upper alimentary tract resulting from esophageal varices, which are mainly supplied by an enlarged left gastric vein (LGV) originating from the splenic vein (SV) or portal vein (PV) and running to the esophagogastric junction along the lesser curvature of stomach, is a major complication of portal hypertension (PHT) secondary to liver cirrhosis. 1,2 At least two-thirds of patients with cirrhosis develop the varices, and approximately 10-60% of patients experience variceal bleeding. 1,[3][4][5] According to the criteria proposed by the Japanese Research Society for Portal Hypertension, 6 grade 2 and 3 varices have a high risk of causing life-threatening upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LGV may be challenging to identify in patients without signs of portal hypertension (detection rate of 70%-75%) because of its smaller caliber. [11][12][13] In cirrhotic patients, the LGV is visualized in 71% to 90% of cases with transabdominal US, depending on patients' clinical conditions and operators' experience. [12][13][14][15][16] Failure to visualize the LGV is mainly due to bowel gas artifacts and a large habitus of patients (ie, obesity).…”
Section: Doppler Us Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 However, less than 50% of cirrhotic patients have varices at the screening endoscopy, which implies a considerable burden for endoscopy units and an increased number of unpleasant procedures for patients. Even though researchers have evaluated many possible noninvasive markers of EV, [3][4][5][6][7] the clinical value remains controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%