“…Simone et al coll., 08.x.2012, SCUBA, 0-10 m; 6 males, 1 ovigerous female (29753), Costa Rica, Puerto Viejo, 9°39'28"N, 82°45'20"W, G. Guzmán coll., 13.vii.2013, intertidal; 1 male (MZUSP 13894), Brazil, Pernambuco, Fernando de Noronha, Praia do Meio, Simone & Souza coll., 22.vii.1999; 1 male, 7 ovigerous females (MZUSP 17712), Brazil, Bahia, Abrolhos, W. Narchi coll., ix.1965; 4 males, 3 ovigerous females (MZUSP 7028), Brazil, Bahia, Abrolhos, Ilha Redonda, P. Young coll., 21.i.1985; 1 male (MZUSP 34990), Brazil, Ceará, Fortaleza, Meireles rock beach, Anker & Feitosa coll., 15.vi.2011; 1 ovigerous female (MZUSP 29139), Brazil, Espírito Santo, Piúma, Calcinus tibicen and the eastern Atlantic C. talismani A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, 1892, superficially resemble each other in having the upper margin of the right chela smooth, and grooved P3 propodus, but can be easily disguished in that the dorsal margin of the P3 propodus is distinctly angulous in C. tibicen, whereas in C. talismani it is rounded (Poupin 2003). Mandai et al (2018a) considered the differences of color pattern among northeastern and southeastern Brazilian specimens of C. tibicen a case of polymorphism and, without further explanation, suggested that it "might be related to the kind of nutrition as well different ecological and evolutionary predation characteristics." Later on, however, Mandai et al (2018b), based on two mitochondrial markers, found that northwestern Atlantic specimens differed from northeastern and southeastern Brazilian coast specimens, despite the lack of morphological evidences to support each genetic group.…”