2016
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4558-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Color-singlet production at NNLO in MCFM

Abstract: We present the implementation of several colorsinglet final-state processes at Next-to-Next-to Leading Order (NNLO) accuracy in QCD to the publicly available parton-level Monte Carlo program MCFM. Specifically we discuss the processesDecays of the unstable bosons are fully included, resulting in a flexible fully differential Monte Carlo code. The NNLO corrections have been calculated using the non-local N -jettiness subtraction approach. Special attention is given to the numerical aspects of running MCFM for t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
267
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
4
267
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also note that there are a number of multipurpose event generators used for the various multi-boson processes, such as VBFNLO (Arnold et al, 2009(Arnold et al, , 2011Baglio et al, 2014), MadGraph5 aMCNLO (Alwall et al, 2014), Powheg Box (Alioli et al, 2010Frixione et al, 2007;Melia et al, 2011;Nason, 2004;Nason and Zanderighi, 2014), Sherpa (Gleisberg et al, 2009;Gleisberg and Höche, 2008;Höche et al, 2009;Schumann and Krauss, 2008), and MCFM (Boughezal et al, 2017;Campbell and Ellis, 1999;Campbell et al, 2015Campbell et al, , 2011b. In the subsections below we concentrate on the current status of theoretical calculations rather than comparing the different MC capabilities.…”
Section: A Current Theoretical Understanding Of Sm Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also note that there are a number of multipurpose event generators used for the various multi-boson processes, such as VBFNLO (Arnold et al, 2009(Arnold et al, , 2011Baglio et al, 2014), MadGraph5 aMCNLO (Alwall et al, 2014), Powheg Box (Alioli et al, 2010Frixione et al, 2007;Melia et al, 2011;Nason, 2004;Nason and Zanderighi, 2014), Sherpa (Gleisberg et al, 2009;Gleisberg and Höche, 2008;Höche et al, 2009;Schumann and Krauss, 2008), and MCFM (Boughezal et al, 2017;Campbell and Ellis, 1999;Campbell et al, 2015Campbell et al, , 2011b. In the subsections below we concentrate on the current status of theoretical calculations rather than comparing the different MC capabilities.…”
Section: A Current Theoretical Understanding Of Sm Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By now the application and validation of N -jettiness subtraction for one-jet processes has been discussed several times in the literature [13,23,24], and we do not review this topic here.…”
Section: Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We impose the following cuts on the final-state jet: p jet T > 30 GeV, |η jet | < 2.4 for Higgs+jet and |η jet | < 2.5 for W + +jet. For the Z + jet process we show a plot for the dependence of the ratio σ NNLO /σ NLO on the power corrections as a function of τ cut 1 and refer the reader to the corresponding paper for more phenomenological studies [7].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We review here the salient features of the jettiness-subtraction scheme for NNLO calculations, which was recently introduced in the context of the NNLO computation of W + boson and Higgs boson production in association with a jet [5,6,7]. We begin with the definition of N-jettiness, T N , a global event shape variable designed to veto final-state jets [9]:…”
Section: Description Of N-jettiness Subtractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation