2017
DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1326544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colorectal Cancer Cells Adhere to Traumatized Peritoneal Tissue in Clusters, An Experimental Study

Abstract: The use of human peritoneal tissue in an ex vivo model would appear to be a potentially useful tool for the study of interaction between human peritoneal membrane and free tumor cells. Experimental surgical trauma increases the ability of tumor cells to adhere to the peritoneal membrane. This ex vivo model should be useful in future studies on biological interactions between peritoneum and tumor cells in the search for novel forms of peritoneal cancer therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 120 publications
(124 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important observation with potential clinical impact, as it shows that tumor cells that are shed off from the primary tumor could attach to and grow into injured sites of the peritoneum, which was already seen in animal models [ 23 ], [ 24 ], [ 25 ], [ 26 ]. In accordance with that, previous investigations observed a tendency of colorectal tumor cell lines to adhere to traumatized sites of the peritoneum or ex vivo cultured human mesothelial cells [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is an important observation with potential clinical impact, as it shows that tumor cells that are shed off from the primary tumor could attach to and grow into injured sites of the peritoneum, which was already seen in animal models [ 23 ], [ 24 ], [ 25 ], [ 26 ]. In accordance with that, previous investigations observed a tendency of colorectal tumor cell lines to adhere to traumatized sites of the peritoneum or ex vivo cultured human mesothelial cells [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%