Colorectal Cancer Knowledge, Risk Perception, and Screening Inclination Among Previously Unscreened Adults

Yen, Timothy; Asiimwe, Edgar; Qin, Feifei; Sundaram, Vandana; Storage, Tina; Ladabaum, Uri

doi:10.14309/00000434-201810001-00293

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With shifting clinical guidelines, this is an optimal time to clarify recommended screening activity, both for patients and providers, to eliminate confusion. Mirroring previous research, participants generally overestimated the lifetime risk of CRC 21,22 ; the implications for this on treatment seeking should be defined in further research. African American or black participants rated their lifetime risk of CRC significantly lower compared with Caucasian or white individuals.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 74%

“…In multivariable linear regression models, previous CRC screening was positively associated with a perceived higher risk of CRC 4). 21,22 ; the implications for this on treatment seeking should be defined in further research. African American or black participants rated their lifetime risk of CRC significantly lower compared with Caucasian or white individuals.…”

Section: Factors Impacting Perceptions Of Crc Risk and Importance Of ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Colorectal cancer knowledge and perceptions among individuals below the age of 50

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) rates are increasing in individuals below the age of 50 and this trend has been projected to continue for the foreseeable future. Health officials are calling for increased awareness of rising rates in affected populations to promote discussion and early detection. Methods In May 2018, we surveyed an online purposive sample of adults below the age of 50 (N = 624). We conducted an exploratory analysis examining knowledge of current CRC screening guidelines, knowledge of available CRC screening methods, perceived risk of CRC, and perceived importance of screening for CRC by gender, race, and previous CRC screening activity. Results The sample was 56% female, averaged 36 years of age, largely identified as Caucasian (84%), married (48%), and well educated (70% with some college or a college degree). 36% correctly identified the current age of recommended CRC screening initiation. Few (8%) correctly identified all CRC screening options presented. Genetics was thought to be the most relevant determinant of CRC. African American or black participants perceived themselves to be at lower risk of CRC, while women rated the importance of screening significantly lower than men. Conclusion We identified a lack of CRC knowledge in individuals below the age of 50. Interventions should correct perceptions of risk of CRC and highlight the importance of screening. Complete knowledge of the range of screening options may reduce barriers to screening while a greater knowledge of modifiable risk factors of CRC can promote healthy behaviors.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 74%

Section: Factors Impacting Perceptions Of Crc Risk and Importance Of ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Colorectal cancer knowledge and perceptions among individuals below the age of 50

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Colorectal Cancer Knowledge, Risk Perception, and Screening Inclination Among Previously Unscreened Adults

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Colorectal cancer knowledge and perceptions among individuals below the age of 50

Colorectal cancer knowledge and perceptions among individuals below the age of 50

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About