2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2015.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colorectal cancer screening in the familial risk population: Is colonoscopy still the strategy of choice?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age was also identified as a valuable predictor of prognosis and it would be better to use different strategies for patients of different ages [ 4 , 5 ]. Early detection was reported to effectively reduce CRC mortality and improve prognosis [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age was also identified as a valuable predictor of prognosis and it would be better to use different strategies for patients of different ages [ 4 , 5 ]. Early detection was reported to effectively reduce CRC mortality and improve prognosis [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to asymptomatic in early stage of CRC, many cases were detected at late stage. In clinical practice, colonoscopy is used in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC, but has not yet been wide-used as a screening tool because of some limitations, such as the requirements of bowel preparation, cost burden and perforation risk [2]. In addition, fecal occult blood test (FOBT), some convenient circulating blood biomarkers, including the most frequently used marker carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigens, CA125, CA153 and CA199, are lack of sufficient sensitivity or specificity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%