2022
DOI: 10.1111/anae.15706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colorectal cancer surgery: is further research necessary?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Colorectal cancer is the most common malignant tumor of the digestive system, and it seriously affects patients’ quality of life 1 , 2 . Surgery is the primary treatment option for colorectal cancer, but the recurrence rate is as high as 30% 3 . Therefore, chemotherapy combined with surgery has become the current dominant strategy in the treatment of colorectal cancer 4 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colorectal cancer is the most common malignant tumor of the digestive system, and it seriously affects patients’ quality of life 1 , 2 . Surgery is the primary treatment option for colorectal cancer, but the recurrence rate is as high as 30% 3 . Therefore, chemotherapy combined with surgery has become the current dominant strategy in the treatment of colorectal cancer 4 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For midline surgical incisions, there are alternative modes of analgesia apart from thoracic epidural or rectus sheath catheters [5] that could have been considered and may well have resulted in an improved experience. These include single-shot spinal anaesthesia using a combination of local anaesthetic and diamorphine [6]; erector spinae plane (ESP) or transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block; [7] lidocaine infusion [8]; or opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For midline surgical incisions, there are alternative modes of analgesia apart from thoracic epidural or rectus sheath catheters [5] that could have been considered and may well have resulted in an improved experience. These include single‐shot spinal anaesthesia using a combination of local anaesthetic and diamorphine [6]; erector spinae plane (ESP) or transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block; [7] lidocaine infusion [8]; or opioid‐based patient‐controlled analgesia. This particular randomised controlled trial had dynamic pain scores at 24 h after surgery as its primary outcome measure, and whilst incisional pain has previously been cited by patients as an important issue to avoid (together with nausea and vomiting and gagging on the tracheal tube) [9] it could be argued that when planning trials we should be including outcomes which are more pertinent to patients' expectations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%