2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01261.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colorectal tubulovillous adenomas identified on fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐d‐glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans

Abstract: Benign colonic polyps produce high-intensity focal FDG uptake in large bowel. Endoscopic evaluation is recommended before curative resectional surgery of the presenting cancer where appropriate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1], which assessed incidental colorectal tumours on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans with 2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxyglucose (FDG), is highly commendable. It supports the established principles and practice regarding lesions incidentally discovered on PET/CT scans of malignant [2] and premalignant [3] origin.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…[1], which assessed incidental colorectal tumours on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans with 2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxyglucose (FDG), is highly commendable. It supports the established principles and practice regarding lesions incidentally discovered on PET/CT scans of malignant [2] and premalignant [3] origin.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…The sensitivity of PET/CT in visualising polyps ≤10 mm is only 21% (46 out of 219), and the 66% (163 out of 247) sensitivity in detecting masses >10 mm is disappointing compared with that of CT colonography (sensitivity 94%) [24, 27, 30, 47–49]. Despite the high molecular sensitivity of PET for the tracer (10 −11 –10 −12  mole/L), smaller polyps can be negative on PET if their signal is spatially and temporally averaged to normal in the 5 mm 3 image voxel and 3-min acquisition time per bed position (partial volume artefact).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several studies, 18 F-FDG PET scans were retrospectively reviewed for abnormal colonic foci. If scan results were positive, a dysplastic adenoma was found in 32%-70% of patients by subsequent diagnostic colonoscopy, indicating that abnormal colonic hot spots at the 18 F-FDG PET scan frequently reflect adenomas (10,15,16). In rats, only 2 small studies have been performed assessing the role of 18 F-FDG PET in adenoma detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 F-FDG is actively taken up and accumulates in tumor cells (7). In humans, colorectal adenomas are detected by 18 F-FDG PET to a variable extent depending on adenoma characteristics (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). 18 F-FDG PET in a mouse model of intestinal adenomas has not been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%