1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80155-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colour Doppler energy (power) mode ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, quantitative assessment of vascularity using CDU has limitations: CDU is less effective than PDU in detecting blood flow at low velocities in microvasculature due to a lower signalto-noise (S/N) ratio; it is prone to alias; CDU is angle dependent and can not detect the blood flow that is close to 90 • to the ultrasound probe (18,19). PDU has a higher S/N ratio, which enables better visualization of the microvasculature, and PDU does not alias and it is angle independent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, quantitative assessment of vascularity using CDU has limitations: CDU is less effective than PDU in detecting blood flow at low velocities in microvasculature due to a lower signalto-noise (S/N) ratio; it is prone to alias; CDU is angle dependent and can not detect the blood flow that is close to 90 • to the ultrasound probe (18,19). PDU has a higher S/N ratio, which enables better visualization of the microvasculature, and PDU does not alias and it is angle independent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, Balakier et al [28] used CDU to locate follicular vessels and pulsed Doppler to assess velocity profiles or impedance to blood flow whereas our study used PDU which is three-fold more sensitive than conventional CDU at detecting flow with low volumes and velocity, and hence improves the visualization of small vessels such as those surrounding ovarian follicles [29,30]. Secondly, the authors combined the longitudinal data on PFBF into two categorized timeframes: blood flow before and after hCG trigger.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, an opaque background makes evaluation of the relationships of the vessels to the surrounding anatomy difficult; flow signals can be presented as lighter hues of the background color or may be assigned to a different, contrasting color. Semitransparent backgrounds have the advantage of allowing identification of the underlying nonvascular structures and thus improve localization of blood vessels but, because the highest gain levels cannot be used, they seem to reduce sensitivity slightly.Power Doppler is almost independent from the beam to vessel angle because it is based on the number of scatterers moving within the vessel, rather than on the frequency shift they generate [2,7]. As long as a Doppler shift is detectable, its power is essentially unaffected by the angle between the US beam and the direction of flow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%