2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(99)00119-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colour Doppler ultrasound: a new index improves the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
2
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
37
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar Doppler parameter called the renalsegmental ratio (RSR) (the proximal renal artery PSV divided by the segmental artery PSV) has been used to evaluate native renal arterial stenosis, and for the detection of a 50% stenosis the RSR >5 has been regarded as the best Doppler criterion compared with conventional Doppler parameters. 22 In our study, the cutoff value of the Post-PSV for the diagnosis of TRAS was larger than that of the RSR for the diagnosis of a native renal arterial stenosis. The following are possible explanations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…A similar Doppler parameter called the renalsegmental ratio (RSR) (the proximal renal artery PSV divided by the segmental artery PSV) has been used to evaluate native renal arterial stenosis, and for the detection of a 50% stenosis the RSR >5 has been regarded as the best Doppler criterion compared with conventional Doppler parameters. 22 In our study, the cutoff value of the Post-PSV for the diagnosis of TRAS was larger than that of the RSR for the diagnosis of a native renal arterial stenosis. The following are possible explanations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…a ratio of PSV measured in the renal artery to that obtained in the segmental artery, was the best parameter (sensitivity 93.33%; specificity 89.47%). Other authors [26] found that renal-interlobar ratio (RIR), i.e. a ratio of PSV measured in the renal artery to that obtained in the interlobar artery, was more accurate (sensitivity 88%; specificity 88%).…”
Section: Proximal Criteria (Direct Evaluation Of the Stenosis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interobserver and intraobserver variability using these criteria is high [29,30]. The rationale is that the flow at the renal hilum downstream to a hemodynamically significant stenosis should become damped and show a slow rise to the peak systole [26]. This phenomenon has been called the ''tarduseparvus'' effect.…”
Section: Distal Criteria (Indirect Evaluation Of the Stenosis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attualmente l'ECD delle arterie renali risulta la principale metodica di screening nella diagnosi di stenosi della arteria renale con numerosi studi in ambito internazionale che attribuiscono a tale metodica valori di sensibilità pari all'83%-96% e di specificità del 76%-98% [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. I vantaggi della metodica sono rappresentati dalla non invasività, ripetibilità, basso costo e buon valore predittivo negativo se eseguito in popolazione selezionata, mentre i limiti riconosciuti sono l'operatore-dipendenza, l'obesità, il meteorismo e le anomalie vascolari, con particolare riguardo alla presenza di varianti anatomiche dell'arteria renale [6,[13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Color-Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) of the renal arteries is the principal screening tool used to detect RAS, with many international studies reporting sensitivity and specificity values of 83%-96% and 76%-98%, respectively [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The advantages of the technique are its noninvasiveness, repeatability, low cost and good negative predictive value when used in selected populations, whereas its known limitations are operator dependence, obesity, bowel gas and vascular abnormalities, especially anatomical variants of the renal artery [6,[13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%